LAWN TENNIS.

Waikato Times, Volume 104, Issue 17581, 10 December 1928, Page 3

LAWN TENNIS.

SATURDAY’S GAMES. CAMBRIDGE SUB-ASSOCIATION. The second round in the Cambridge Lawn Tennis Sub-Association competitions was played on Saturday. A Grade. Roto-o-rangi v. Fencourt.—ln this match, which was played at Cambridge, the Fencourt team were the winners by 15 sets (133 games) to nine sets (110 games). The scores were as follows, Roto-o-rangi being mentioned first in each case: — Men’s Singles: Robinson v. Swayne, 7—5; Clow v. Jamieson, 7—6; Hewitt v. Cubis, 7—2; Cox v. Thomas, 7 —5; Hansen v. A. Jamieson, o—7. Ladies’ Singles: Miss Nolan v. Miss Jamieson, I—6;1 —6; Miss Hall v. Miss J. Feisst, 6—5; Mrs. Glow v. Mrs. Cubis, 5—6: Miss Robinson v. Miss Qualtrough, 4—6; Miss Hewitt v. Miss E. Feisst, 5—6; Mrs. Wiles v. Miss M. Jamieson, I—6. Men's Doubles: Robinson and Clow v. Swayne and Feisst, 5—7; Cox and Hewitt v. Cubis and Thomas, 7—l; B. Hewitt and Hansen v. Jamieson and Jamieson, 4 —7. Ladies’ Doubles: Misses Nolan and Hall v. Misses Jamieson and Feisst,

2 —G; Mrs. Clow and Miss Robinson v. Mrs Cubis and Miss Robinson, 5—6; Miss Hewitt and Mrs. Wiles v. Misses Feisst and Jamieson, 5—G.

Combined Doubles: Miss- Nolan and Robinson v. Miss Feisst and Swayne, 3 —7; Mrs. Clow and Clow v. Miss .Jamieson and Jamieson, 6 —7; Mrs Hall and Cox v. Mrs Cubis and Cubis, I—7; Miss Robinson and Hewitt v. Miss Feisst and Feisst, 7—5; Mrs Hewitt and Hewitt v. Miss Qualtrough and Thomas, 7—3; Mrs. Wiles and Hansen v. Miss Jamieson and Jamieson, 3—7. Cambridge No. 2 v. Hautapu.— Ilautapu proved the winners of this match by 15 sets (129 games) to nine sets (93 games). The scores were as follows, Cambridge being mentioned first in each case. Men’s Singles: Wilson v. Peterson, 7 —2; Gibbons v. Appleby, o—7, by default; Watson v. Roberts, 4—7; Atkinson v. Hooker, o—7, by default; Nickle v. Bellamy, 7 —4; Entwisle v. Cubis, 7 —3. Ladies’ Singles: Miss Swayne v. Miss M. Bourke, 6 —2; Miss Priestly v. Miss K. Bourke, 2 —6; Miss N. Armstrong v. Miss V. Appleby, 5—6; Miss Cowley v. Miss F. Appleby, 3—G; Mrs. Ward v. Mrs. Petersen, G—l; Miss Skeet v. Miss Bradshaw, o—6. Men’s Doubles. —Wilson and Gibbons v. Petersen and Hooker (default), o—7; Entwisle and Atkinson v. Appleby and Roberts, 5—7; Watson and Nickle rv. Bellamy and Cubis, I—7* Ladies’ Doubles: Misses Savage and Priestly v. Misses M. and K. Bourke, 3 —G; Misses Armstrong and Cowley v. Misses V. and F. Appleby, 6 3; Mrs Ward and Miss Skeet v. Mrs Petersen and Miss Bradshaw', G—3. Combined Doubles: Miss Savage and Wilson v. Miss M. Bourke and Roberts 7 G; Miss Priestly and Gibbons v. Miss K. Bourke and Appleby, o—70 —7 (default); Miss Armstrong and Watson v. Miss V. Appleby and Petersen, G —7; Miss Cowley and Atkinson 1 v. Mrs. Petersen and Hooker, o—7 (de-

fault) ; Mrs. Ward and Nickle v. Miss F. Appleby and' Bellamy, 5 —7; Miss Skeet and Entwisle v. Miss Bradshaw, and Cubis, 7—5. B. Grade. FIRST ROUND. In the B Grade match played at Hautapu, Trinity defeated Hautapu by 18 sets (139 games) to six sets (89 games. The scores were as follows, Trinity being mentioned first in each case:— Men’s Singles: Williams v. Watt 7—l; Clothier v. Cubis, 7—l; Nicholson v. Russell, 7—4; Simpson v. Hooker, I—7; James v. H. Hooker, 3— l ; Hay v. Sullivan, 4—7. Ladies’ Singles: Miss H. Robson v. Mrs. Russell, 2 —6; Miss Levesque v. Miss Barker, 6—2; Mrs. Clothier v. Miss C. Hooker, 6—o; Miss E. Price v. Miss McLeod, 6—o; Miss V. White v. Miss McLeod, G—l; Miss Lynds v. Miss B. Cubis, 6—4. Men’s Doubles. —Williams and Clothier v. Watt and Cubis, 7 —5; Simpson and Nicholson v. Russell and Hooker, 7 —l; James and Hay v. H. Hooker and Sullivan, 7—5. Ladies’ Doubles: Misses Robson and Levesque v. Mrs. Russell and Miss Barker, 6—4; Mrs. Clothier and Miss Price v. Misses C. Hooker and McLeod, G—l; Misses White and Lynds v. Misses McLeod and Cubis, 5 —6. Combined Doubles: Miss Levesque and Clothier v. Miss Barker and Cubis, 7 —5; Miss Robson and Williams v. Mrs| Russell and Watt, 7—4; Mrs. Clothier and Nicholson v. Miss Hooker and Russell, 7 —4; Miss Price and Simpson v. Miss McLeod and Hooker, 7 —o ; Miss White and James v. Miss McLeod and 11. Hooker, 7—2; Miss Lynds and Hay v. Miss Cubis and Sullivan, 5 —7.