Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BUTCHER FINED

BREACH OF SLAUGHTERING ACT. A charge of exposing for sale meat which had been slaughtered other ihan at a licensed slaughter house was preferred by the Agricultural Department 'represented by Inspector Burton against, a Hamilton butcher, named F. Wooclhall, before Mr If. A. Young, S.M., ;•! Hamilton yesterday. The Inspector slated Ihal on November 20th meal wns found for siile in Woodhall's shop which had nol hen killed al a registered slaughter house. Butchers were not, of course, allowed |,o kill their own meal, except under proper supervision by a Government inspector, and it was highly essential, in Ihe interests of both the butchers themselves and Ihe general public. thai meal should he killed under proper sanitary conditions. Although the Department of Agriculture had action in this case, it was really the duly of the Borough Council lo exercise a proper supervision in Ihe matter. A number of local butchers were in Ihe habit of killing their own meal, and several of them had been previously warned. The Department did nol press for a heavy penally, bul brought Ihe case more as a warning to others. His Worship: But why should Ihey wanl a warning? They know what the requirement'' of the Ac| are. Mr Northcrofl, for Woodhall, said that his client had never previously been warned. lin this particular occasion it was holiday lime, and he could neither gel hisrarler nor drover to take the lambs to Horotiu, and he was therefore fared with Ihe position of killing his own meal or being left without any In bis shop. The Inspector had no fault whatever lo find with the lambs, which were perfectly wholesome. His Worship said Ihe broach of this regulation was a serious pyitlor. and the legislature apparently regarded it so by allowing for a penally un lo £SO. ' Tn Ihe present circumstances. however, there had apparently been some slackness in prosecuting, and as the Inspector did nol press for a heavv penalty, he would merely impose'a fine of £lO and costs. Future rases would be dealt with more severely.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19210208.2.75

Bibliographic details

Waikato Times, Volume 94, Issue 14586, 8 February 1921, Page 6

Word Count
344

BUTCHER FINED Waikato Times, Volume 94, Issue 14586, 8 February 1921, Page 6

BUTCHER FINED Waikato Times, Volume 94, Issue 14586, 8 February 1921, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert