This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.
GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES AND ANNUITIES.
« (From tho Cuiiterbu-y Press ) The report of the Annuities Commissioner, which has been lnid before Pnrliament, is on the whole satisfactory. The number of proposals received shows that an increasing interest is being taken in the subject of life assurance, and that the undertaking of the business by the Government is beginning to hf appreciated by the public at large. We are nevertheless of opinion that the system has not met with tho encouragement it deserves. The successful conduct of the business of life assurance is so largely dependent upon activity and pushing management, that it is scarcely to be wondered at that, however givat the advantages of the Government assurance may be over those of assurance companies, the latter have succeeded in holding their own ngainst. it. We shall attempt to point out what advantages the Government office offers in comparison with those of companies. In the first place, the most striking difference is on the particular of security. In the case of companies, this consists of the investments in which the premiums and reserve fund have been accumulated, such portion of the pain up and uncalled capital of the shares as may not have disappeared, and the unlimited liability of the shareholders. In the case of the New Zealand Government assurance the security is simply the colony itself. Nothing short of the utter and irretrievible insolvency of the colony can by any possibility defeat the satisfaction of any claim. Judging fairly of both cases ths balance of advantage in security seems to be obviously on the side of the Government office. Experience has reoeatedlv shown that the best conducted assurance companies may undergo, in a (aw years, a complete revolution in their management and condiiion. Half a century of the strictest care, of invest ments on abundant security, and with correspondingly moderate profits, may be succeeded by a period of speculation, in which the accumulation of years are dissipated, and a position of wealth and safety exchanged for a floating existence, dependent mainly upon the chapter of accidents, and the doing of fresb business to cover claims arising out of the old. It would be unjust to suggest that, in the case of many companies, perhaps in most, such disasters are at all likely to happen, but we think it right to point out that the whole security which the assured has, generally speaking, rests upon assets and administration over which he can have no control or influence whatever, and which may be good or bad exactly according to whether the judgment and ability of the directors are good or bad. Life assurance, as hitherto conducted, has unquestionably been a great public benefit, but it is worth while to see whether its benefits cannot be made more sure and more general. "When people insure their lives, unless for some temporary purpose of business, it is done once for all ; they depos'-t their savings in the full confidence that there is no shadow of doubt as to their intention being fulfilled. It is therefore startling every now and then to read of an old established company being wound up, and its policies becoming little better than waßte paper. We believe that the New Zealand Government Assurance should be looked upon with thorough confidence in this respect. There may be some who affect to question the ability of the colony to provide a perfect security to the assured. The reply to these is the simplest. If New Zealand cannot make good its life policies to ita own colonists, it is not o safe place to invest any savings or capital in, nor to settle in. Another point of comparison, and one of an importance secondary only to the question of security, is the difference on the rates of premium. An examination of the rates charged by companies shows that in assurance without profits the lowest rate adopted by any company is considerably higher than the New Zealand Government rates. Of life assurance with profits we are not now treating, for it is of course out of the question for the Government to undertuke business of this kind. We think, however, that it will not be difficult to see that the extra premium paid for assuring with profits would, if invested in shares in building societies and similar institutions, prove more profitable in the majority of cases than paying so much more than is necessary for assurance to the directors of the assurance company, to invest or speculate with on behalf of the assured. Indeed, it seems clear that if the profits are to be better than thoae which the assured could make out of his 6xtra payments, the risk of the companies 1 investments musfr be so. considerable as to be quite incompatible with certainty that the policy will be paid when it falls in. There are other reasons which should entitle the Government assurance to be warmly supported by the public. Amongst others we will, without laying ! undue stress on it, mention that if the I profits of life assurance can be made to flow into the Colonial Treasury, instead of into the pockets of foreign shareholders, the public gain will not be slight Still better will it be, if the taking up of the business by the Government leads to the profits of assurance remaining in great part in the pocket of the provident colonist. Notwithstanding the advantages which, iv our opinion, should make the Government assurance popular, we think that there are certain obstacles to speedy success. One of these is the habit of reference to Wellington before any policy is conoluded. Surely a means might be devised of doing away with such a fertile cause of delay and expense. A very moderate annual outlay should suffice to make risks readily acceptable in tho large towns throughout the colony. In the case of tho most important places, it is probable that it might answer well to
have an agpncy in the hands of an officer who should have enough of his time free to push the business. It is to be hoped that the Government will give an earnest attention to perfecting the system which they have wisely introduced, and which, we think, may be of the greatest permanent benefit.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WI18711024.2.18
Bibliographic details
Wellington Independent, Volume XXVI, Issue 3327, 24 October 1871, Page 3
Word Count
1,047GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES AND ANNUITIES. Wellington Independent, Volume XXVI, Issue 3327, 24 October 1871, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES AND ANNUITIES. Wellington Independent, Volume XXVI, Issue 3327, 24 October 1871, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.