Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT.

WELLINGTON. 1

<Before Bingham A. FERABD.Esq , KM.)

Friday, QLh March, 1.860,

Regina v. Benjamin Sewell., Prisoner was charged with an inrtecferit assault, iipoji Harriet Francis Barnes, the daughter of;" William Robert Barnes, upon the evidence <i^ William Barnes, the grandfather arid Mrs. Barnes lijs wife. Prisoner was! committea to fake liistnal' at the liext sittings "of the Supreme^ Court arid witnesses bound over to prosecute.' Prisoner was afterwaids admitted to hail. •" • •"•••■

Saturday, 10/ A March..

Rosanna Maria VJHylton' was charged with drunkenness. Fined 20s. '

Harris v. Atcbisqn — Defendant-was, charged with having assaulted complainant who is a police constable whilst in the execution, of duty as such police constable. Adjourned "u> the 12th instant . . :- .-..

Monday, 12/ A Match,' 1860. John Redmond charged* with drunkenness, Fined 6s. . .... ..'

Harris v. Atehison.— (Adjourned case). De fendant was charged with assaulting complainant, and from the evidence it appeared complainant was on duty at the Odd Fellow's Hall at.- the -ball given to Henry St. Hill, Esq., K.M., ;and in consequence" of some instruction whic^ complainant, had received not to allow any person in the lobby of the Hall,: ordered defendant to leave,, some .wjmts arose, and defendant struck complainant. ~Defendiint was ordered to pay £2 andcosts,J > 65.6 d. in default to be; imprisoned for one , qaleqdar month. Fine ami costs were paid. '. • .;. Regina v. Wilson. — Prisoner James Wilson was cbarprrd with having on the lQth. Mi»iph, 1860, nt Wellington. aforesaid, -stolen .and car tied away an order for the payment of £2 rm\de Tjy John Nicolls on Win. Scott "in favour of Edward Bohon, ; dated, Paubautitnui, September 13th, 1850. ;' Prisoner committed, to. take i his trial, and witnesses hnnnd over to prosecute. Tuesday, 13th March, 1860. : . Hall v. Wilkinson~^(adj'>urned ; case); . : This was an action to recover the sum of £9 os. 9(1;, for work and labour done. Judgment .for £i 3d. 6d., and costs/ '...'■. '■'..' f Phillips v. Lttwis -An action to recover the sum of £l Is., for firewood sold and delivered. Judgment by cert sent for amount and costs. .. Schiiltze v. Waldegrave, — An action to lecower the sum of £7 16s. 9d. for goods sold and.; delivered. Judpniiat for arnoui.t and costs. ■ Jackson v. Duck- An action to .recover the sum of £4 13s. 6d, for goods sold-atid delivered. Parties called, no appeal ance. ," • - Cockroft r. Johnson — An nct'nji to recover .the sum of £'S 3s. 6^d., for tj) eat supplied Judgm«nt by consent for amount. '".'""

Martin v. Luxford V Lino-— An action to'recover the t-um of£\\ 4s. lid., (or goods sold and delivered. ';Adjourned v to the 15th March, instil nt. -'-' '

Allen v. Bannister.— An action to recover tbe sum of 19s. 3d., for poods sold and delivered. Judgment expm'te for amount and costs. : Kane v. Sim.— A-n action to recover tlie §urn of £l 4s. lOd.V- foi goods sold and "delivered, Sutled out of Court. . ~ ; '"':' ' '

Pickett v. Cimdy— An action' t(f : rec/^er the sum of£lsss. \-6d\i for poods sold anti delivered. Judgment fjr nmduut and costs. ' '■ " .

Brown v. JffxiHs — An action to recdv'er the sum of £8 115. 6d. t for board and lodging. Judgment for amount and costs. •

Loxley v. Jillett- (Aijourned case), stands over until the 22nd instant. " •

A uguste v.Davis— An .»ction to recover the sum of £18 4s. 2cL Judgment -for JESTIs, 3. Frahce v. Austin — An action toriecover the sum of £\) 19s. 3^d. for cartage afld moneys paid (or and on account of defendant. "Judgment for defendant, with costs. "■■.■•"■ -. Wedvef4ay, \4ih March, .lß6o. „-'••. The, Besidey t . Magistrate hel'rff: hi? usual court at the Hutt, and disposed of three bases. There were no cases' iu the poiice:Bbeet for. ••Wellington. -1 ■ . ■ ■ .-.;••:

Thursday. Ibth March, 1860. • The Court was occupied- life ..morning • '« swearing in about twenty special constables, for the purposed taking charge of'the. Military. Barracks, and Powder MaKazines^MdmntCook, it being understood- tkat their. semces-jvmrld be 1 required this evening at 6 o'clockyif the military should embark-for T»ranaki. -. '.-■. -.; . . .: .;

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WI18600316.2.19

Bibliographic details

Wellington Independent, Volume XV, Issue 1413, 16 March 1860, Page 5

Word Count
651

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT. Wellington Independent, Volume XV, Issue 1413, 16 March 1860, Page 5

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT. Wellington Independent, Volume XV, Issue 1413, 16 March 1860, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert