The Appeal Court
By Telegraph.—Press Association. Weiunqion, this day. In the case Ha'nkins v. tho King tho Appoal Court held that the suppliant was on* titled to damages by fcbd neglect of tho Railway Department to maintain a oro.seing, and there ivas no contributory nogligenoo. The award of 1450 will therefor* stand, ) In the case .Coqlwly 'and another v, Johnstou and another, a question of copyright in a race card, tho Court held that there was 1 no evidence of 'fraud, and tho claim for infringement could' 'riot bo sustained, as the oardwas; published rather earlier than the official card. In PJitnrapr v.Pliiumor, a case under thpToatitor's Fanyily • Mriintenaiice Act, the Court directed it to be-, re-argued and further parties joined to the case,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WHDT19051102.2.33
Bibliographic details
Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume V, Issue 1472, 2 November 1905, Page 3
Word Count
124The Appeal Court Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume V, Issue 1472, 2 November 1905, Page 3
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in