Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Lawyers in Arbitration Cases

A Far-Reacning Barrier

B.v Amooiation. DtrsßniN, this day, DritiNG the hearing of a case against tlircsltino-mill owners, a witness iiwidcn. tally drew attention to tho l'acs that Mr Scott, who was conducting (ho case for tho Union, was ti solicitor. Tho latter urged that ha had abandoned tho law, and had never practised it; but Iho president said his namowasoii Iho roll, and he could pracli.'c at any time on paj menl of tho fees, Ho thought that nothing was cloarer than that solicitors could not appoar without the consent of all parties, mid Mr. Siwt, who was president of iho union, ou'd not thcreioro lake part in tho ease.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WHDT19040902.2.34

Bibliographic details

Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume IV, Issue 1083, 2 September 1904, Page 3

Word Count
114

Lawyers in Arbitration Cases Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume IV, Issue 1083, 2 September 1904, Page 3

Lawyers in Arbitration Cases Waihi Daily Telegraph, Volume IV, Issue 1083, 2 September 1904, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert