AUCKLAND DIVORCE CASE
{Per Press Association.) , . AUCKLAND,!! Noy. 3. * The divorce case in which Mary Andrews sought ihe dissolution of he! marriage with Ernest Frank Andrews was-concluded in the Supreme Court today.' His Honor said the' case' was an important one. A serious charge was. made against the respondent If there was reasonable doubt the respondent should hive the benefit of that doubt.' • The jury, after a, retirement lasting two hours)‘returned a verdict in favour of the' respondent. They stated that in their opinion there whs not ; sufficient evidence to prove adultery., His Honor said he quite agreed with the verdict. He was sure he would havo come to the same decision himself. An order was made for thee-payment of the wife’s costs by respondent to an amount to "be fixed ,by the Court if tht parties fail to agree;
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WH19201104.2.15
Bibliographic details
Wanganui Herald, Volume LIII, Issue 160798, 4 November 1920, Page 3
Word Count
140AUCKLAND DIVORCE CASE Wanganui Herald, Volume LIII, Issue 160798, 4 November 1920, Page 3
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.