MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Tuesday, Maeoh 10th.
0, J. McCarthy v. Mrs A. E. Bcott, claim £107 Is 6d for furniture in Rutland Hotol, claimed by Mra Soott as " fixtures." After reviewing the " ancient histoiy of the Rutland Hotel," Mr Brobant, in giving judgment thia morning, said :— " In the oase I am deciding tho articles claimed were affixed aud paid for by various persons at different times, and thore is really no reason why they should bo declared to bo tbe property of Mr McCarthy rather than Mr Parsonn. while on the othor hand if tha Court compelled Mrs Scott to pay for these things it oppejrs ehe would have purchased (judging from Mr Parsons' etidence), a law Buit rather than hotel furniture. Tho judgment of the Court is for tho defendant, with costs." The costs wore as follows :—: — Court costs 4s, witnesses oxponaoa 275, and solicitors fee £5 7s.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WH18960310.2.38
Bibliographic details
Wanganui Herald, Volume XXX, Issue 8796, 10 March 1896, Page 3
Word Count
148MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Wanganui Herald, Volume XXX, Issue 8796, 10 March 1896, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in