Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ALLEGED LIBEL.

BERTLING v. NORTON. (Bμ Telegraph. — Press Association.) WELLINGTON, Wednesday. Before the Chief Justice (Sir Robert Stout), to-day, Robert Bertliug, supariuteudeut of the Wellingtou Zoo, claimed £2000 trom John Norton, proprietor of Truth, for alleged libel. The case was tried before a special jury. Defendant denied that the words complained of reflected on plaintiff iv his occupation, or had been published falsely or maliciously, or were libellous or defamatory, and submitted that in their natural aud ordinary signification they were true in substance and in fact. It was stated that au apology had been published, which was said by plaintiff to be no apology at all, but a case of addiug insult to injury.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT19100317.2.28

Bibliographic details

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume LXII, Issue 9628, 17 March 1910, Page 6

Word Count
115

ALLEGED LIBEL. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume LXII, Issue 9628, 17 March 1910, Page 6

ALLEGED LIBEL. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume LXII, Issue 9628, 17 March 1910, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert