R.M. COURT.
GREYTOWN—WEDNESDAY, (Before H. A, Stratford, R.M., and F. H. Wood, J.P.) Edward Orbell v. John Tully—Failing to destroy the rabbits on land occupied by him, Defendant pleaded guilty, hut desired to give evidence as to the steps he had been taking. The Court ruled that if there were any rabbits on defendant's land, evidence would not avail him unless it was in mitigation of penalty. The informant only pressed for the minimum fine, and the defendant was fined £lO, and costs 16s 6d. H, W. Kempton v. Richard Ross — Debt £sloa. Judgment for plaintiff for amount and costs.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18851022.2.8
Bibliographic details
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VII, Issue 2126, 22 October 1885, Page 2
Word Count
100R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume VII, Issue 2126, 22 October 1885, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in