Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

How’s That?

Questions on the "Laws of Cricket” will be answered on this page each week by the Wanganui Umpires’ Association, with the object of making loaal players more conversant with the game.—“ Montpelier.” Question: If a bowler should knock the wicket with his foot in delivering the ball and so dislodge a bail or bails, does the act in itself justify an umpire in calling “no-ball”? Answer: No. (vide Law 11, note b.) If the batsman is distracted by such an action, however, he may draw away from the batting crease and make no attempt to play the ball, in which case it shall not count as one of the over.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19480129.2.88

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, 29 January 1948, Page 8

Word Count
112

How’s That? Wanganui Chronicle, 29 January 1948, Page 8

How’s That? Wanganui Chronicle, 29 January 1948, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert