Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WRITERS WRITERS ARE GREAT Eaters

Some Gastronomic Feats : )

TW anybody thinks Hat poets, and literary men gene:?-, a -e ethereal cr watures who care life v f nothing for ,o< d sustenance he io s h o ) had better thbw» a S a i n » wri* 3 - . el Compton injt he Evening T Naturalists Jttticed )irds of our woods and gardens V‘- --- va ys eaLug when they are not willing; and much the same thing appl J human songsters. y a Dante Gabriel Ros : « wrote beavtiful love-lyrics. He^— STecf depleted system witl most enormous meals. It is that he would lhake a light break®! of half a dozen eggs and a like 3cr °f rashers of bacon. Physiologists c;. J ate that literary work carried onf V one hour “takes more out of” a mn than manual work done for three hair' In other words, literary work is ihi - times more excusing than the t* r k of a farmlabourer or a navvy. Brain, therefore, eds more sustenance than brawn, needs it in large quantities and at n e frequent intervals. The case of lackeray was a case in point. The -ithor of Vanity Fair and The Newmes was a tremendous man stanch well over sixfeet, and likewise a fnendous worker. ; i And he had an aftite to corres- ' pond. ; 1 A pathetic story is’ld of Charlotte < Bronte meeting who was j to r a demigod, fc he first time at ‘ 8 dinner-party. She tched with sor- e rowful amazement t! immense in- c roads which her idol de on the food, a and just as he washout to engulf c ; J; • fork involuntarily t breathed, “Oh, Mi T 1 :eray, don’t!” h There is another -authenticated ci anecdote of the great jd.He was engaged to dine with fry important b personage, when he hd that a fav- v ourite dish, broad bean.id bacon, was a on the dinner-menu a* s club. He o could not resist it Heht a message to his expectant host to r that he had s met “a very old friended could not e te-jr himself away. Ttfhe made a 1< solitary and very of beans i and bacon. | a Then, who does not reaTh keray’s a poetical outburst in pr- - ast v lire * 1 ’ "A good leg of muttbti. Lucy, , I prithee have ready at 3/ Have it tender ana . stfrii’ag and juicy, I And what better meat van ’here I be?” j

d Mi.Ov man and great novelist il , xan d re Dumas, and he, >too, r was trencherman, besides r himself as a cook. It was n said be cou i d make, and dispose of, s an 01 nelette comprising a dozen eggs, r and that to him a whole roast fowl ’ L-Wargmere snack. Dumas’s interest in 1 S oo 'Wood and drink is evinced every - now Aid then throughout the pages of his noVei Se Allusion to great feats of • eating and drinking abound. Dickc ns> too, revelled in descriptions ;of come _ / cs> an d could become lyriI cal ovei* the making of a steak-and-i kidney oudding, as all readers of ■ “Martin Chuzzlewit” know. He was proud oh his skill at concocting ginounch, apd always wound up the day 1 with a jbrum of that seductive fluid. Oliver Goldsmith was no mean performer a knife and fork, and even wrote a iVem on a haunch of venison. The gastronomic performances of his friend al 3 contemporary, Samuel Johnson, il-g notorious. Tennyson- was not a puny trencherman, eithcL iik e m y mutton cut in chunks, 1 was the only remark he vouchsafed L o his dinner-neighbour on a certain ni<- lora h] e occasion. Two heart!, ea t ers o f i a ter days were G. K. Chesterton and Arnold Bennett. , The latter thought he was a gourmet, I but he was 4 nore o f a gourmand. At any rate, hel knew less, really about good eating Bhan he imagined he did. G.K.C. wal devoted to good Burgundy and it! h as been recorded that once when hel h a d been out in the rain and caught a-Aj ac i co id he preferred to chase it awajl w jth Burgundy rather than with an ~ v | of the more orthodox hot drinks. ThV generous had the desired effect. I A literary ml H 1 w hose feats of gluttony were incr| dible , was an editorial writer on the 2< ew York Press, known as “Uncle DudlL yr A fellow-member of the paper wril es o f him like this: His appetite X- as beyond belief. I saw him one m(I )rn j n g break a dozen eggs into a hugl, tumbler, butter the less liberally, anA then gct away with it down to the | last scrapin g. This achievement woull have not scemed SQ amazing had h« 4 • the eggs J with -;r te for 'luncheon three hours k?cr \ : not so good. But] he was ready tor his dinner. It is thus obvious that, whatever “Uncle Dudley’s” Ijterary output was, he needed plenty of support to achieve it.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19380401.2.11

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 80, Issue 77, 1 April 1938, Page 3

Word Count
852

WRITERS WRITERS ARE GREAT Eaters Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 80, Issue 77, 1 April 1938, Page 3

WRITERS WRITERS ARE GREAT Eaters Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 80, Issue 77, 1 April 1938, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert