BRITISH FILMS
THE AUSTRALIAN REPORT PRODUCERS INDIGNANT LONDON, April 16. British film producers are indignant at the cabled extract from the report of the Australian Censorship Board, declaring that British films required twice as much cutting as American. “They could not have *een more than three or four British talk films,” said Mr Herbert Wilcox, of the British Dominions Film Corporation, “therefore I should like to know on what they based their statement that the best talk films of English life are made in America, and that the British films require more cutting than American.” Mr Wilcox contended that rhe British displayed a greater sense of fitness and decency than any other country. Production of th? technical side of th? British industry had made enormous strides. The Morr. ; ug Post comments: “The censors, however expert in judging fi.bns, Know very little cf Entish *ife, or -ncy would not mistake travesty fot a faithful picture, all of which goes to prove what, a powerful hold the American films have established in Australia, and what a long way the British pry-(’ar-trs have to go in order to shake <11?. ♦ hold.”
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19300419.2.83
Bibliographic details
Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 73, Issue 92, 19 April 1930, Page 10
Word Count
188BRITISH FILMS Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 73, Issue 92, 19 April 1930, Page 10
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Wanganui Chronicle. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.