Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LACK OF IMAGINATION

pDLLOWING the "Dawn” controversy in England, yet another complaint against the Lord Chamberlain, acting as censor of stage plays, has arisen.

His department has advised a producer that a play recently submitted will be passed “on the understanding that the torture scene is modified to the extent of omitting entirely the tearing off of the dress of Ruth and the actual production of the redhot iron.” The producer complains bitterly that these modifications will spoil his play—he desperately wants his real, redhot iron, and he promises, in a protest to the Lord Chamberlain, that "it shall not be placed within dangerous reach of the girl’s flesh.”

But is this acting or poker-work? Is the audience supposed to have no imagination at all? Hundreds of scenes of prospective torture, from the one in "King John” onwards, have been played out with cold irons and the pretence that they were heated: why seek to change the tradition now The producer’s answer is a good deal more serious than his trivial complaint. In effect, he asserts that it is admitted that the modern "crime drama” is entitled to the closest approximation to hideous realities, and he asks why he may not use a red-hot iron when other producers have been permitted by the censor to show a hanged man disappearing through the trap below a scaffold, or a "death chair” with its occupant finished off by electrocution.

It is the old argument, rarely received with much respect even in a nursery, that two blacks make a white, but it does suggest that there is a contemporary taste for the cruder and less imaginative forms of horror, and that the censor is prepared to make queer concessions to it. But why should we want crude horrors, and why should the censor, if there is to be a censor at all, sometimes choose to support the demand? In spite of all modern advances in many other directions it looks as though the theatre-going imagination must be duller than it was 30 years ago.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19280609.2.20

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20168, 9 June 1928, Page 6

Word Count
341

LACK OF IMAGINATION Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20168, 9 June 1928, Page 6

LACK OF IMAGINATION Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20168, 9 June 1928, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert