Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE

THE BOROUGH COTTAGES, (To the Editor.) Sir, —Re the correspondence published by Messrs Bassett and Co. on this subject, we think it would have been as well had they confined themselves to the outstanding facts. Our main contention is that the Council, without any expense to themselves, could have got competitive prices in other materials, and we are informed that Bassett and Co. quoted 6/- per hundred feet more for “Nonka” on this occasion than they did on the last when there was competition. In the whole of Messrs Bassetts ’ letter there is not one word refuting this position, though they can find room to inferentially inform me that if I don’t “shut up” they will publish some awful circular, and then heaven only knows what would happen. I fancy every decent-minded individual who has read this correspondence will resent such obnoxious and contemptible tactics as the use of veiled inference and innuendo, though Messrs Bassett and Co. may think otherwise. Now that the tenders have been made public, let us compare them with the last. Taking the prices on an average they are £lO9 per house higher than “Nonka” houses as tendered for on the first occasion, and £l6 per house higher than the cost of the present brick buildings. For the present proposed work, five firms put in a tender, as against fifteen firms last time. A local architect called for tenders for one house only a week ago, and received fifteen tenders. As large ratepayers, we are entitled to criticise the expenditure of borough funds, and, to say the least, we cannot commend the Council for their business acumen over this matter. However, the workers who buy the houses must pay.—We are, P. J. JACKSON, Wanganui, 18th January, 1924.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19240119.2.77

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXI, Issue 18916, 19 January 1924, Page 12

Word Count
293

CORRESPONDENCE Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXI, Issue 18916, 19 January 1924, Page 12

CORRESPONDENCE Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXI, Issue 18916, 19 January 1924, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert