INTERESTING LICENSING POINT.
(Per Press Association.)
HASTINGS, May 14
Mr Dyer, S.M., delivered his reserved judgment in the case Police v. Hollis, charged under Section 215 of the Licensing Act with being a prohibited person, and that he entered licensed premises, viz., the licensed booth on the racecourse. The defence was that the booth was not within the meaning of licensed premises, Section 215. A conditional license was issued under Section 82, and no mention was made of any particular premises, which is thq case in dealing with'publicans' licenses. The Magistrate in his judgment held that a placp where liquor is sold under conditional license was only to be considered as licensed premises 'in so far as offences against the public order, illicit sales, and adulteration of liot'or were concerned. In respect to prohibition, orders and breaches of such orders, he did not think pfaces to which conditional license referred could be deemed licensed premises. He thought, therefore, the defendant did not enter licensed premises. The information was dismissed.
In view of the magistrate's decision a member of the Hawke's Bay Licensing Committee has filed a, notice of motion that the (committee refuse any more conditional licenses if th© judgment is upheld. ;
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19190515.2.60
Bibliographic details
Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXVI, Issue 17571, 15 May 1919, Page 7
Word Count
202INTERESTING LICENSING POINT. Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXVI, Issue 17571, 15 May 1919, Page 7
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Wanganui Chronicle. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.