Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

(Otti correspondents opinions are theU own; the responsibility of editorial items makes sufficient ballast for the editor's shoulders. It is necessary that all letters for publication should bear the name of the writer—vot necessarily fot publication, but as evidence of good faith J

TO THE EDITOR. SIR,—I find that it is still persistently asserted in the town that I was asked to act as chairman at Mr Greenslade's meeting on Friday last and that I failed to keep my appointment. As it is not my practice to act in this discourteous manner under any circumstances, I wish to state most emphatically that though expecting in virtue of my position as chairman of the local Board to be invited to preside on the occasion in question, I was not asked by anyone to do so. Charles Bowden.

TO'THE EDITOR.SIR, —In your last issue an anonymous person wrote over the name of "Housewife," accusing some local tradesman of unfair practices. I should think that a charge of so serious a , nature ought to be signed by the-accuser and completed by the name of the accused. To spread such charges unspecialised is decidedly unfair to the body of tradesmen of Te Awamutu, and to do so under a nom de plume shows a cowardice hardly surpassable. —I a*m, etc., E. MOELLER. Te Awamutu,'Nov. 23, 1911. TO THE EDITOR. SIR, —The following is a cutting from the Auckland Herald of Wednesday, 22nd inst.: — "A CORONATION GRANT.

“(By Telegraph. —Own Corres“pondent.) “ Cambridge, Tuesday. “Mr Greenslade, M.P., informs the Mayor that he has succeeded in getting the Coronation grant of £250, application for which was made after the prescribed date, reinstated.” This has surely been circulated by an enemy of both the Government; and Mr Greenslade, for neither (especially on the eve of. an election) would be a party to such an act of apparent bribery and corruption. Every other district whose application “ was made after the prescribed date ” is being refused, and rightly so. —I am, etc., VOTER.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIPO19111124.2.17.1

Bibliographic details

Waipa Post, Volume II, Issue 64, 24 November 1911, Page 3

Word Count
333

Untitled Waipa Post, Volume II, Issue 64, 24 November 1911, Page 3

Untitled Waipa Post, Volume II, Issue 64, 24 November 1911, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert