PRECEPT AND PRACTICE.
On Thursday last the mouthpiece of the Liberal Party in Wellington published an article in which it made the unwarranted and mean suggestion that the Prime Minister had run the special "trial train" to Auckland for his own particular benefit. On Friday the same journal, in a complaint that Somebody had hinted that Sir Joseph Ward was fraternising with the Bed Feds, said: "In the turmoil of a general election, much is permitted. But falsehood is not within the limit. Neither is false suggestion, because falsehood of suggestion is one of the worst forms of falsehood." How about the Auckland train? Where does the. Liberal apologist stand in that matter? Is it wicked to make a false suggestion in regard to the Liberal Leader and a commendable thing* to make a similar suggestion in respect to the Leader of Keform? Consistency, thy name is partizanshipl
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19191115.2.18
Bibliographic details
Wairarapa Age, 15 November 1919, Page 4
Word Count
148PRECEPT AND PRACTICE. Wairarapa Age, 15 November 1919, Page 4
Using This Item
National Media Ltd is the copyright owner for the Wairarapa Age. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of National Media Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in