Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PSYCHOLOGY IN THE COURT-ROOM?.

That perfect honest and truthful persons may, on the witness stand, testify to directly contradictory statements in regard to the same occurrence, is proved by Hugo Ministerberg, professor of psychology at Harvard University, n "Nothing but the Truth," in the September "McClure's." He says, however:— "The jurymen and the judge do not discriminate whether the witness saw in late twilight a woman ,J in a red gown or one in a blue gown. They are not expected to know that such a faint light would still allow the blue colour sensation to come in, while the red colour sensation would have disappeared. They are not obliged to know what directions of sound are irixed up by all of us and what are discriminated; they do not know, perhaps, that we can never be in doubt whether we heard on the country road a cry from the right or from the left, but that we may be utterly unable to say whether we heard it from in front or from behind. They have no reason to know that the victim of a crime may have been utterly unable to perceive that he was stabbed with a pointed dagger; he may have felt it like a dull blow. We hear the witnesses talking i about the taste of poisoned liquids, i and there is probably no one in the jury box who knows enough of physiological psychology to be aware that the same substances may taste quite differently on different parts of the tongue. We may hear quarrelling parties in a civil suit testify as to the size and length" and form of a field as it appeared to them, and yet there is no one to remind the court that the same distance must appear quite differently under a hundred different conditions. The iudge listens, perhaps, to a description of things which the witness has secretly seen through the key-hole of the door; he does not understand why all the judgment? as to the size of objects and their place are probably erroneous under such circumstances. The witness may be sure of having felt seething wet, and yet he may have felt only some smooth, cold metal. In short, every chapter and sub-chapter of sense psychology may help to clear up the chaos and the confusion' which prevail the observation of witnesses."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19071119.2.5

Bibliographic details

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8984, 19 November 1907, Page 3

Word Count
395

PSYCHOLOGY IN THE COURT-ROOM?. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8984, 19 November 1907, Page 3

PSYCHOLOGY IN THE COURT-ROOM?. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8984, 19 November 1907, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert