Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE NEW HEBRIDES.

LORD ELGIN'S DESPATCH. Received January 16, 9.35 a.m. MELBOURNE, January 16. Lord Elgin's despatch, dealing with the New Hebrides question, has Jbeen published. He expresses regret that in most cases the Imperial Government has found it necessary to differ with the Commonwealth, but any discourtesy is disclaimed. , In conclusion, Lord Elgin states that his Majesty's Government do not in any way regard the convention as a final settlement of the problem, but he claims that it constitutes a clear and important advance in the system, or lack of system, by which the affairs of the islands have hitherto been governed, and provides a fair settlement for the most difficult ques'tion which confronts the two Governments. The adjudication of land claims gives natives a regular recognised authority to whom they may appeal. Lord Elgin deeply regrets that the Imperial Government had not secured the hearty concurrence of the Australasian colonies in the course it had adopted, but they feel they would have failed in their duty if they had hesitated in accepting the responsibility thrown entirely upon them |by the Commonwealth and Zealand Governments, and to give the convention the seal of their" definite approval and confirmation. The Federal Premier (Mr Deakin), commenting on the despatch, said he. had no desire to prolong the controversy. The first and last that the Commonwealth heard of these matters was that the French proposals had been made and accepted, and a convention drafted which they must examine, but not alter. In face of this, Mr Deakin continued, he regretted to say that it was "impossible for us to our protest against the manner in which the convention was.arrived at without consulting the Commonwealth." SYDNEY HERALD'S CRITICISM. "A LAME AND IMPOTENT DOCUMENT." Received January 16, 9.53 a.m. x SYDNEY, January 16. , The Sydney Morning Herald characterises Lord Elgin's reply to the Australian condemnation of the New Hebrides convention as a lame and impotent document.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19070117.2.11.20

Bibliographic details

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXIX, Issue 8334, 17 January 1907, Page 5

Word Count
322

THE NEW HEBRIDES. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXIX, Issue 8334, 17 January 1907, Page 5

THE NEW HEBRIDES. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXIX, Issue 8334, 17 January 1907, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert