Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UTTERING OF CHEQUE.

Accused Man Remanded for Sentencee. Per Press Association. NAPIER, This Day. In summing-up in the case in which Edward Mountford Tunnecliffe, aged forty, who is charged wit.h uttering a cheque for £IOOO. and with obtaining £IOOO by falsely representing that a cheque for that amount was a good and valid order. Mr Justice Blair said that it was a first-class forgery. Prisoner, however, was not charged with forgery. Had he been, he would have told the jury that if there had been sufficient evidence of issuing the cheque that it would have been sufficient to convict him of forgery. After an absence of sixty minutes, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of uttering the cheque. The accused was remanded for sentnce. (The case for the defence appears on Page 11.)

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19350529.2.76

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20626, 29 May 1935, Page 7

Word Count
134

UTTERING OF CHEQUE. Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20626, 29 May 1935, Page 7

UTTERING OF CHEQUE. Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20626, 29 May 1935, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert