Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAIM SUCCEEDS.

Hairdresser to Pay Damages. (Special to the \ "-Star.") AUCKLAND. November 28. Alleging that by negligent and unskilful treatment she -had received a scalp burn during treatment for a permanent wave, and that she was permanently disfigured, Mrs Sheila Samson, in the Magistrate's Court, before Mr Wyvern Wilson, S.M., claimed from Sareta Salon, Ltd., ladies’ hairdressers and beauty specialists, £IOO general damages and £7 2s special damages. The defence said that on a conservative estimate, over the last five and a half years there had been 257,400 treatments and in only three cases had burns occurred. In the present case the burn was a pure accident, for which defendant was not responsible. It was pointed out that the burn would have responded to immediate medical treatment and would not have reached its present condition had it received that attention. Magistrate’s Comment. After hearing the evidence, the Magistrate said that a burn might be a very infrequent happening, but it was one that should not take place with the exercise of proper skill, and the defendant company had failed to satisfy him that it was not negligent. He did not think it was the duty of a salon to dress a burn afterwards, but it would be wise to send the client to a doctor, otherwise the damage would he aggravated. No permanent disfigurement of the head had resulted from the burn. There was a spot the size of a threepenny piece where the hair would not grow again, but that was not disfigurement because it was in a position where it would not be noticed. The medical evidence induced him to believe that plaintiff would receive no more trouble from that part of the head. By way of special, damages, which included medical expenses, he would allow £5 18s. She was not entitled to the refund of the cost of the hairdressing treatment, but she would be awarded £lO general damages on account of pain and suffering.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19341129.2.150

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20475, 29 November 1934, Page 16

Word Count
328

CLAIM SUCCEEDS. Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20475, 29 November 1934, Page 16

CLAIM SUCCEEDS. Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20475, 29 November 1934, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert