Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CAT AND DOG IN LAW.

LONDON, March 10. Dr Edwin Smith, the Hammersmith coroner, pointed out at an inquest, an unusual distinction between cats and dogs, in their legal relation to motorists. It was not generally known, he said, that a motorist must treat a dog in the same way as a human being if he ran over one. He was required by law to stop after running over a dog, but he need not do so if. it was a cat.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19320322.2.62

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Volume XLIV, Issue 379, 22 March 1932, Page 5

Word Count
82

CAT AND DOG IN LAW. Star (Christchurch), Volume XLIV, Issue 379, 22 March 1932, Page 5

CAT AND DOG IN LAW. Star (Christchurch), Volume XLIV, Issue 379, 22 March 1932, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert