Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LOWER ESTIMATES.

School Committees are Concerned.

The all-round reductions in the estimates for education were the subject of a report by Mr S. R. Evison, secretary of the Canterbury School Committees’ Association, at a meeting of that body last evening. To draw the attention of Cabinet Ministers and Members of Parliament to this, a deputation of school committee-men Visited Parliament House in Wellington on August 6, and pointed out to members the necessity of making an adequate grant for education purposes. Mr Evison was a member of this deputation. The conclusions arrived at by the deputation were as follows: (1) That the cost of education had increased because the policy of the centralised administration, as authorised by Parliament, has made the increase inevitable. (2) That a substantial reduction of cost cannot be effected without a reduction in overhead, that is, in administration costs, and teaching staffs. (3) That a reduction in administration costs and .staff involves either the closing down of certain branches, or of diminishing the efficiency of the whole by understaffing and the withholding of necessities.

(4) That the first course—that is, the closing down of certain branches—is inevitable if efficiency is to be maintained in the remaining branches. (5) That the cost of social services (education of blind, deaf and feebleminded children, and the child welfare organisation) should not be charged to the cost of education. “We are told that the national expenditure on education last year totalled £4,500,000 as compared with £1,058,222 in 1929-30,” said Mr Evison. “One million of last year’s expenditure is not accounted for in the estimates, and, as in past years this difference of a million pounds is presumably made up in the expenditure on new buildings, school committees’ subsidies, scholarships and bursaries, university grants and teachers’ superannuation. We are still in the dark as to how it is proposed to deal with these items in the current year, and any further reductions will have a serious effect on the work of the schools.” It was decided to ascertain from the Minister of Education the amount of saving that would result to the Department of Education from consolidation of schools, as against the increased transportation charges.

It was further decided to circularise Canterbury Members of Parliament bringing under their notice these reductions and asking them to speak against further cuts when the estimates were being discussed in the House.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19310813.2.50

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Volume XLIV, Issue 191, 13 August 1931, Page 5

Word Count
397

LOWER ESTIMATES. Star (Christchurch), Volume XLIV, Issue 191, 13 August 1931, Page 5

LOWER ESTIMATES. Star (Christchurch), Volume XLIV, Issue 191, 13 August 1931, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert