Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HANDICAPPING TROTTERS

Improving The System.

The system of handicapping now operating in the trotting sport was brought into force at the commencement of last season and although it was viewed with a lot of suspicion in some quarters, when first it was mooted, ii, has proved its worth in nearly every direction. As was to be expected, difficulties were ‘soon encountered, necessitating the clearing up of doubtful points, but most of them have been got oven' quite sat'sfactorily. When the Trotting Conference met in July the subject was due for review, as the system was in operation for a year only. There appeared to be a prospect of the whole subject coming under review again, with a lengthy discussion, the result of which was not easy to forecast. Fortunately, however, an easy way out was discovered, in the decision to give the present season a trial for another year before taking any action to alter or amend the conditions. With full consideration for the whole situation, this was a wise move. The present season is now well advanced and the time seems opportune to discuss the question, with a view to further improvements in the system as originally formulated. One thing that appears to be quite certain is that there will be no return to the old handicapping methods. This being the case, those in authority should set to work to perfect . the present system. Its general principle is a limitation of penalties for horses who are placed in races, graded according to the classes in which they have registered their performances. One result of the freedom given to the handicappers is that some striking inconsistencies have been produced. As matters stand at present, this is unavoidable, due to the varying views of different officials concerning the value of performances, one handicapper imposing the full penalty allowed, while another is content with something less severe. This is a feature of the system which has given rise to much discussion. ’ Many solutions of the problem have been offered. Some keen followers of the sport go the length of suggesting that the discretion at present allowed handicappers should be abolished and that hard and fast penalties, graded as at present, according to class, should become the rule. This proposal

has much to recommend it, as it would place all horses on an equality of treatment. Another point that has been much discussed is the position of horses entered for *-aces on the actual time they have recorded, when they are entitled, to be handicapped under the system, to a place in a slower class, a definite rule to cover such cases would be >velcomed. Some critics urge that if an owner chooses to enter a horse in a race for which he has qualified on time, he should not later expect to be handicapped on the slower mark which was his due under the system. The argument of these critics is that an owner is not entitled to have his chance both ways. He has his option, and having chosen he should be compelled co abide by the result. It must be admitted that this view is reasonable and logical, and its official recognition would get rid of some difficulties. A general review is needed in another direction. While a definite scale is provided for the distance at which a horse registers his performance, something is • required to covei the position as it applies to other distances. A pacer winning a mile race, class 2.24 or slower, may be penalised up to 48yds for future race<= of a mile, but there is no uniformity in the method of treating him in races over other distances. The difficulty caused in this way is continually in evidence and some strange anomalies have been created by the difiering views of handicappers. It is rarely that a meeting takes place without difficulties of seme kind cropping up—difficulties which, in the main, could have been avoided. Those who framed the present handicapping conditions are deserving the thanks of all followers of the sport. They produced a scheme which, on the' whole, has worked well. That is an assertion that admits of no doubt. The racing has improved wonderfully under the new order. But the time is now j opportune for another step and the executive of the New Zealand Trotting j Conference should set up a committee I to formulate a scheme which would get j over the difficulties which have been : disclosed since the system has been in force.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19301129.2.119

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Issue 19240, 29 November 1930, Page 12

Word Count
753

HANDICAPPING TROTTERS Star (Christchurch), Issue 19240, 29 November 1930, Page 12

HANDICAPPING TROTTERS Star (Christchurch), Issue 19240, 29 November 1930, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert