Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNFAIR RULES OF CONTRACT ALLEGED.

P.W.D. SCHEDULES SAID TO PENALISE TENDERERS. Per Press Association. WELLINGTON, August 21. Complaints of unfairness in the conditions of contract used in respect to public works were made to-day to the Government through the Minister of Railways by a deputation from the New Zealand Federated Builders and Contractors’ Association.

It was pointed out that the conditions of contract provided that, should any schedules of quantities or other information be supplied to contractors, they were intended only for the assistance of the contractor in checking his own estimate, and that no claim of any kind would be allowed should they be found inaccurate or incomplete. The contractor was required to rectify any mistakes before tendering.

It was submitted that these clauses violated the cardinal principles of British justice, inasmuch as the contractor was made responsible for the inaccuracies of the Public Works Department’s engineers.

The Minister said he could not make a definite promise outside his own department: and, as the representations concerned other Ministers, and, indeed, t:> some extent the whole Government, it seemed to him that they would have to be considered by Cabinet. He would confer with the Minister of Public Works. Then Cabinet might consider whether the Government was justified in relaxing the regulations in accordance with the representations. As far as the Railway Department was concerned, they were already considering the conditions of contract. The requests of the deputation would be taken into consideration. He promised that a reply would be furnished after the matter had been fully considered.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19300821.2.89

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Issue 19154, 21 August 1930, Page 9

Word Count
258

UNFAIR RULES OF CONTRACT ALLEGED. Star (Christchurch), Issue 19154, 21 August 1930, Page 9

UNFAIR RULES OF CONTRACT ALLEGED. Star (Christchurch), Issue 19154, 21 August 1930, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert