A TENNIS INJUSTICE.
To the Editor. c;{ r ,—The New Zealand Lawn Tennis Association has drawn up a Dominion ranking list, and I am amazed to see that Miss Muirson. of Canterbury, has been left out. Miss Muirson is third on the ("anterburv ranking list following Miss. M. Spetrs and Miss M. Wake. During last season, however. Miss Muirson defeated Mrs M. Scott, of Timaru (who is second on the New Zealand list) in one of the most gruelling games that have been seen in New Zealand. This was the final of the Dunedin Exhibition tourney in which Miss Muirson bear Mrs Scott at her own game. Mrs Scott i< a worthy player, but I am inclined to think that in a game with Miss Muirson for her place on the list she would have to go right out and them some to avoid defeat. What I want to know, sir, is why Miss Muirson is not on the list? If my indignation was a ton of bricks the men responsible for the compilation of the first New Zealand ranking list would be flatter than the proverbial pancake bv now.—l am. etc.. CANTERBURY.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19261109.2.65.3
Bibliographic details
Star (Christchurch), Issue 17999, 9 November 1926, Page 6
Word Count
193A TENNIS INJUSTICE. Star (Christchurch), Issue 17999, 9 November 1926, Page 6
Using This Item
Star Media Company Ltd is the copyright owner for the Star (Christchurch). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Star Media. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in