LAWN TENNIS.

Star (Christchurch), Issue 17781, 26 February 1926, Page 3

LAWN TENNIS.

SUBURBAN TOURNAMENT. HANDICAP EVENTS, Following are the draws for handicap events at the annual Suburban tournament, which will begin at Wilding Park to-morrow:— LADIES’ DOUBLES HANDICAP. First Round—Mesdames Crampton and Wren (rec 15) y. Mrs Park and Miss Park (rec 155); Mesdames Mawsen and Burrell (scr) v. Misses Williamson and Blooi;, (owe 15); Misses Hall and Gofton (ref 15) v. Misses Wright and MUir (scr) ? Misses Tait and M’Donald (rec 415) v. Misses Wenmouth and M*rt*ters (owe 415); Misses Baynes and M" An ley (owe 415) v. Mrs Fuller and Miss Douglas (rec 415); Mrs Watson and Miss fjhnitli (owe 35) v. Mrs Peppier and Miss M’Coll (owe 15). Second Hound—Misses Maloney and Gamble (rec 415) v. Misses Leighton and M’.Ynb (owe 15); Misses Jorgenson and Hobson (rec 15) v. Mrs Chapman and Miss Hookham (owe 15 X; Misses E. and M. Harvey (owe 15) v. Misses Down and Smither (rec 415); Mrs Christiansen and Penfold (owe 415) v. Misses Holmes and Motlarid (owe 154); Misses F. and E- Ward (owe 15) v. Mrs Chalklin and Miss Lowe (owe 301). MEN’S DOUBLES- HANDICAP. First Round—Silvester Bros (rec 15) v. Chapman and Hay,ties (owe 15); Evans and Mahoney (scr) v. Oldridge and Guy (rec 15); Pottinger and Thompson (rec 15) v. Peppier and Brown (owe 15); Hoskins and Hollobon (scr) v. Snmill and Watson (owe 151); Miller and Croll (rec 15) v. Tillman and Orbell (owe 154); Murray and M’Millan (scr) v. Gunderson and Nichols (roc 15); Burrell and Mawson (rec 415) v. Benjamin and Jewjss (scr); Merrett and Cow per (sci) v. Vesty and Hollobon (owe 154): Spicer and Kenworthy (<-we .Jls) v. Wilkins and Howard (rec 15): Penlington a njd Geddes (owe 15) v. Craze and Watson (scr); Christiansen and Penfold (owe 415) v. Kellar and Second Round—Dickson and Schmidt (owe 30) v. Brittenden and O'Malley (owe J 1 3); llawkins and M'Keown (owe 304) v. ; Mercer and Gardiner (owe 15) v. Good and Chambers (rec 415). COMBINED DOUBLES HANDICAP. First Round—Miss Wright and Hoskins (owe 15) v. Miss A. Powell and Thompson; Miss M’Kendry and Corbitt (rec 15 h) v. Mrs .M’Auley and Benjamin (rec 415); Miss Lowe and Schmidt (owe 30) v. Miss Halligan and Halligan (owe 15); Mrs Chapman and Chapman (awe (15) v. Miss M. Martin and O'Malley (scr); Mrs Baynes and Tillman (owe 415) v. Miss Bloor and Merrett (owe 15); Miss Smith and Daly (rec 15) y. Mrs Spicer and M’Keown (owe 30); Miss Maloney and C. Evans (rec 415) v. Miss Srnytho and J. Ken worthy (scr). Second Round —Miss Ilookham and Smith (scr) v. Miss Parke and Gardiner (scr); Miss Watson and Watson (owe 415) v. Miss E. Ward and M’Millan (ewe 415); Miss Hall and Haynes (scr) v. Mrs Geddis and Geddis (owe 415); Mrs Fuller and Mercer (owe 41.5) v. Mrs Mawson and Mawson (rec 15), Miss M’Donald and Murray (rec 15) v. Mrs Chalklen and Hollobon (owe 30 2-6); Mrs Burrell and Burrell (roc 115) v. Miss Harvey and Craze (owe 415); Miss Wen moth and Evans (scr) v. ; Miss Holmes and Hollobon (owe 415) v. Miss W. Gofton; Mrs Christiansen and Christiansen (scr) v. Miss Morland and Dickson (owe 154); Mrs Penfold and Penfold (scr) v. Miss Leighton and Hawkins (owe 30); Miss Gamble and Mahoney (Tec 4-6 15) v. Miss Williamson and Cow per (owe 415): Miss C. Tait and Jcwlss (rec 4-6 15) v. Miss Sopp and Parish (rec. 415); Mrs Peppier and Peppier (owe 415) v. Miss M’Nab