SUPREME COURT.

Star (Christchurch), Issue 17381, 8 November 1924, Page 11

SUPREME COURT.

CIVIL CASES FOR HEARING. The following is a list of the civil cases set down for hearing: at the civil sittings commencing on November 17: Before a .bulge and common jury of four: Bennett (Mr Sargent) v. MacU.regor Mr Ol liver)- _193 I(>b, breach of agreement. Before a judge and common jury of Collins Olr Alpers) v. H.M. tho Kino—£2ooo. death of husband Hannah (Mr M. (Ires son) v. Springs. Llleemere ileetric Power Boaril—A‘lsoo injuries due to negligence. National Bank of New Zealand (Messrs . *"(! V: V. Lynch (Mr Donnelly) (> V_- “ ue under agreement. r.agle (Mr K. (Jresson) v. Xorrisli ♦'m breach of promise. Adams Ctrl (Mr Buchanan) y. Yd* (Mr plied. thy} ~ £ ™ 128 M ’ »“PHobbs (Mr Tivyncham) v. Shields (Mr Thomas)—-.±.728. damages for negligence through a motor collision. Bates (Mr Donnelly) v. Queensland Insurance (Mr Alpers)— £2150, due under fire, insurance policy. Humphries (Mr Johnston) v. Anderson—£l464 15s. damages for negligence through motor collision. (Mr Thomas) y. Paterson and Co. -aU2 Ills 6d. injuries in employment. Crumpton v. Boyd—£2ooo, damages tn ro ugh mis re presen tat io n. The following is a list, of cases for hearing at tho civil sittings commencing on A o vein lie r 10: Before a judge alone: ,Mr Upham) v. Bradley (Mr V\ lidmg>—Accounts and rectification. J. A. Stephen. Ltd (Mr Upliam) v. Wightman and another (Mr Sim)—£49s, parable in respect of shares. J. A Stephen, Ltd (Mr Upliam) v. Wightslm (Mr ,sim ' —£soo. payable in respect of Harris (Mr Sim) v. Ramsay (Mr Thomas) -.16 ;»s. instalments of purchase money al T l „o!?i! lW ffT r ’ C, wV“* *^ 363, beach ( Mr White) v. Matson and another (Mr Upham)—Accounts and £260 11s Barry (Mr Batchelor) v. Dra-nsfield (Mr Lascelles)---specific performance or s l non damages for breach of contract. Redpatli (Mr M. J. Greason) v. Mann Genge and Ou., Ltd. (Mr Sim) £-3950 balance of purchase money on specific performance. H.M. the King (Mr M. J. CJ reason) v Fieimng and Co. (Mr Wright)— i 231 6s Sc\ balance in wheat sold to defendant ’ Fulton and another (Mr O'Connell) v. b Mr Tv. M. Gresson)—possession of Smith (Mr Dougall) v. Dowdle (Mr Thomas)—order for execution transfer re right of way. Holmes (Mr Hunter) v. Holmes and another (Mr Alpers)—removal of trustees Fleming (Ml* Alpers) v. Henderson—cancellation of agreement, possession etc MidcUctoi. (Mr Wilding) v. Ireland ’ (Mr Aicholls) £350 damages, breach of agreeLister (Mr Cracroft W ilson) v. Sbeelian (Mi - Thomas; —£250. breach of promise. Moir (Mr Donnelly) v. Smith—£473. misrep re sen ta t io n. Gallagher (Mr Saunders) v. James—execution of transfer. Fass (Mr Thomas) v. Honan—specific performance. Marshall (Mr Alpers) v. Price—possession of books, accounts and £25 damages. Packer and Jones, Ltd. (Mr Alpers) v. Anderson—£223 7s Bd, paid under mistake. A. Cleave and Co., Ltd. (Air Sim) v. Christchurch 'Starr Bowkett Building Society (Mr Thomas)—declaration that mortgage is void. Dwyer (Mr Upham) v. executors of Osborne, deceased—declaration that donatio mortis causa of £284 11s -id is valid and binding.

fort xgn affairs," declared Dr Marx, Chancellor of Germany, in an election speech in Munster, in which he emphasised that Germany could not afford to be considered abroad as equivocal and unreliable. “My view is.” said Dr Marx, “that the admission of Nationalists into the Cabinet is calculated to reawaken foreign mistrust of Germany. What the consequences of renewed mistrust would be, it is not possible to foresee, but it might easily affect the evacuation. “ Germany’s foreign policy must be based on mutual understanding. Germany might thump the tabic and rattle the sabre, but otlu r nations are strongly armed, whereas Germany is disarmed and defenceless, and therefore her only freedom lies through calm negotiations.”