Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CENTRALISATION OPPOSED.

SECONDARY SCHOOL PRINCIPALS. Pkr Pres* Association. WELLINGTON. May 13. Cbnsiderable discussion took place at the annual conference of the Secondary Schools Principals’ Association to-day upon receipt of a circular .letter from the Auckland Grammar School Board dealing with certain difficulties which it is said had been experienced. The circular stated that, the Auckland Board had reason to believe that dissatisfaction was widely felt by secondary school boards in the Dominion, with the excessive and increasing centralisation of control of secondare schools in the Education Department'. Wellington. The powers of board* were taken away by the issue of ana cessive regulations and unless some effort was made to arrest the move ment the hoards would be reduced if mere intermediaries, carrying on l mechanically the orders of the Depart ment. It was suggested in the circular that some joint action should he tak % - and a proposal was made in regai\ to a deputation to wait upon the Minister of Education. Mr Cress we 11 moved : “ That th. principals of secondary schools fa voir the system of local rating as a mean, of raising at least a part of th< funds required for educational pur poses, believing that such procedun would: (a) stimulate local interest am pride in education because of thi measure of decentralisation : (b) pu an end to the suspicion of preferentia treatment as between district and dis trict ; (c) bring about the mucli-neede-. divorce of education and politics: un< (d) by giving more initiative and re sponsibility to local boards, dignify th membership of such bodies, and indue the ablest men to accept office. The motion was seconded pro forma hut it was decided to defer furthe discussion on the matter until late in the conference.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19240513.2.68

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Issue 17348, 13 May 1924, Page 8

Word Count
289

CENTRALISATION OPPOSED. Star (Christchurch), Issue 17348, 13 May 1924, Page 8

CENTRALISATION OPPOSED. Star (Christchurch), Issue 17348, 13 May 1924, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert