Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

TO-DAY'S SITTING. A sitting of the Supremo Court, in banco, was bold this morning, bis Honor Mr Justice Denniston presiding. | DESTITUTE PERSONS' ACT. I In the matter of Jane Walker Prim- ; mer (Mr Hunt) v. John .Barclay (Mr | Gresson), plaintiff asked for an _ inter- I pretation of sub-section 2, section f>, Destitute Persons Act, 1010. which gives a Magistrate power to make an order against a near relative for the maintenance of a destitute person. Section 33 of the Act states that where there are two or more near relatives, orders can bo made against any or all of these persons liable. .Mr -Hunt said that his client was an elderly woman, riot in good health, and orders had been made against two of her relatives for 10s 6d weekly each, the Magistrate declaring that he was not able under the Act to make a larger order, although he was willing to if he bad the power. Mr Gresson argued that £1 Is weekly was taken by the Aet to be sufficient to raise a person from the class of " destitute persons." The he said, was passed to prevent destitute persons becomiug a burden on the State and not for the redistribution of family wealth. His Honor reserved .judgment. A "WIFE'S APPLICATION. His Honor delivered judgment, in the matter of the will of Stanley I. Deugarde, deceased, in which his wife opposed the granting of probate. Deceased had appointed a woman other than bis wife as executrix of Ins will, to enable her to obtain possession of certain shares he had given bv deed of gift, but which could not be transferred legally in the period before , his death. • His Honor said that be could not oppose the granting of the probate to the executrix. Even if he was satisfied that he had the power to pass over the executrix, and appoint an administrator, ho was not prepared to cio so. vSlig was tlx? choice of the t-cstotor, <\nd it must be assumed that he intended her to have any personal benefits which such an appointment might give her.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19160911.2.73

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Issue 11800, 11 September 1916, Page 6

Word Count
351

SUPREME COURT. Star (Christchurch), Issue 11800, 11 September 1916, Page 6

SUPREME COURT. Star (Christchurch), Issue 11800, 11 September 1916, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert