Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

CIVIL SITTINGS.

•' The cnvil sittings of the Supremo j ourt were continued today before Mr 1 Justice Dtennistoii. ' ,The action ""Robinson (Mr Alpen?) v. (•Gorbett (Mr Beswick) wax allowed to \ stand, over m the Meantime. It will -be heard before a special jury. i In "William Woods and Co. v. Jams, [Mr E. T. Harper, for the plaintiff, I said that the claim was for the interest and tho defendant had raised a quesl tion «f accounts on s counter-*aim Und asked that the matter should he i referred to the registrar. Hk Honor ■ referred the matter as requested. i Knight. (Mr R-ow) v. "Wilfred Bad- . j/er (Mr Izard) was adjourned to the ,• n«st sessions. e In Edwin Cuthbort (Mr Alpers) r. Smith and others (Mr Beswict) counsel -"for the defendant said that the ease •demanded a minute examination of. the liooks of Charlca Hill, a solicitor who Jiad absconded. He therefore asked . That the ease should U-- adjourned to ' the next session. Hill was solicitor for both partita to the ea*o and a --areiful examination of the books wr»s required. An adjournment hn- ;iu indefinite period was "ranted. Mr Samuel Thomas (Mr Alper.O r. T,. ' Hopkins (Mr A. T. Donnelly) the hearin a wn* set down for Thursday.

!|f) IKWVORCE. f This Afternoon his Honor held a ,*itipc m Divorce, taking uudeiended LEA'PHE&I v. LEATHEM. In U'-ithem (Mi-Bishop) v. Leathern, (Mr Hunt), counsel ■ for the rospoisd-•-1 t -rated that the respondent hud not W'»n able to file an answer to the petition. Wause he had hod his libertx tnl v .i fifty ar two. t ftie c.i>e waii adjourned for a week. ft ■ iIUDSON v. HUDSON. r * FlixnMih Hudson (Mr Donnelly) apphed ioi a divoree from Thomas Ed- > \ , id llud-om who did not appear. Tin petitioner stated that aboutWiVe \<ais si'ao her husband left her. They had lived in. Christchnrch from the - d.'le (/I their marriage until his depar- . -tun' \ woman, Ivy Mary Day. had Tf hi hoi that she was the mother of a tbild ol which the respondent was the jt-itlni Mrs. Day stated that the re- • sponovmt admitted that lie was the tathet i;id contributed towards the child - support. James Aikman, assistant uulitt a,t the Magistrate's Court-, jifn e iin ilar- evidence. A dec-tec nisi, to he made absolute .m thu'e months, was grant od. ( OULSON v. COULSON. Vmiind CouLson (Mr Donnelly) ptytitwiied ioi a divorce from I'obort \Vil- ,' ham ou the grouud of desertion

T!(o ixditioner said that alter hermarriage she and her husb.md were . connected with the stao;c. There were 'three children of the marriage. Tin.. \ respondent left her in ClirisU-hurch i.u 1 January, 190 S. telling her that she and \ her three child veil were an 'uiremibrance '.to him on the stage. She last -saw ; )iim four years ago, when he was tra'valliug through the Domini■: , .ii on i'ho Fuller circuit. A dfxaee nisi, to be made absoluio in three months, was granted, with an order that the petitioner should have en*tody of the> children. i . PHILLIPS v. PHILLIPS. ! ('aroliue Jane Anna Phillips (Mr Donnelly) applied for a divorce- from Henry Grosvenor Phillips, on the ground of desertion. The petitioner in evidence said that . aJ'ter marriage she. and her husbund ; lived in Halswell aud suhsoqneutly in - Woolstoti. The resnondent left her .on March '-'6 19J0. "She obtained an order from the Magistrate's Court, for --the 'maintenance, of heivelf and child. She had not seen her husband sinecha left lior. LvidoiK'O \i;is also f^iveu !>y MatiUU Lose Buteman and W. A. 1 I>. liankN, clerk of the A.lagistrato's .J"oirrt. Me said that the. maintenance o'iwes were before the Magistrate'.* Court on February ''2i\, IP.IU. A dtei'ee nisi, to be niade. absolute in three months, with the custody of the child, was granted. PARR-KLL v. KAHRKfd.. .Patrick Joseph Farreil (Mr Malley) appiied for a divorce from his wife. Annie 'Elizabeth'Farreil, ou the ground of habitual drunkenness. : The petitioner said tliat he niarricd the re.sp-ondeiit. on February p>, \:\{y.j.. There woi'R three children living, t.lje loungesfc being now five yea.r-s. For fully ~ifc years the re?ppudeat had beet) zri "habitual drunkajd. Sh« had been to Pak'atoa'lsland, and three times in ■the iSalvation Army Home. A decree nisi was granted. • The Court then adjourned until 10.;',o a:ni. on the following day.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19150517.2.54

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Issue 11390, 17 May 1915, Page 6

Word Count
716

SUPREME COURT. Star (Christchurch), Issue 11390, 17 May 1915, Page 6

SUPREME COURT. Star (Christchurch), Issue 11390, 17 May 1915, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert