Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL COURT.

[Per Phicss Association.] WELLINGTON, April 22

The Court of Appeal this morning intimated that it did not want to hear Mr ReicJ. counsel for the respondent in the case of the King v. Auckland Electric Tramway Company, Limited. It gave judgment, dismissing the appeal with costs on. the highest scale, as the case had come from some distance. The Court hold that there was no evidence of negligence on the part of respondent's niotorman. Decision in the cases of the King v. O'Shaughnessy and the King v. Campbell and Hassell was reserved.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19120422.2.46

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Issue 10441, 22 April 1912, Page 3

Word Count
94

APPEAL COURT. Star (Christchurch), Issue 10441, 22 April 1912, Page 3

APPEAL COURT. Star (Christchurch), Issue 10441, 22 April 1912, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert