Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE 44-HOUR WEEK.

WHAT LABOUR WANTS.

THE LAW OF THE LAND.

MINISTER HOLDS OFT NO HOPE.

The Minister for Labour (the I .Hon. G. J. Anderson) held out no hope op Monday to the deputation from the Allliance of Labour which asked that legislation he introduced making the 44-hour week the law of the land. The matter, stated the Minister, was one for the Arbitration Court to decide. /‘THE WORKERS’ GOAL.”

For many years past, urged Mr J. Roberts (secretary to the alliance), the workers had been struggling to get file 44-boim week; and since 1.910 the trend had been in the direction of reducing the hours of labour to 44 per' week. For his own part, he favoured a 40-hour week; hut for the present he advocated that the 44-houry week should" he made the 'law of the land. Since the railway strike, he remarked, a number of people had been' calling for the 48-hour week; but he might state definitely that the Alliance of Labour was not going to have the 48- > hour week, and trouble would result if an attempt was made to introduce it in a number of industries ; connected vyitli the, alliance.

In view of the fact that in other countries a reduction of the hours of lobour had tended to increase production, he could not see any reason for - departing from the 44-hour week in ' this country. A five-day ( week of, eight hours per day was now being ad- : vocated abroad. Fully 70 pei cent. Y of the workers in the Dominion were now working' dn tho/'basis :^Plbouilß per week, and it would save endless argument if only Parliament could see '■ jts way to legislate in favour of (he re- • tention of the 44-hour week. * A 36-HOUR WEEK?

In support of the i made by Mr Roberts, Mr W. T. Young (general .secretary. • f the Se*- .' men’s Federation) stated that ihe time was probably' coming when hours woul have to be reduced 'from -14 to 40—perhaps even to 36—-in order to keep those men employed whom, machinery threw out Thousands of men were being displaced by the mechanical appliances that wore being introduced on the waterf.enos; and the introduction of o’l fuel, also, was throwing thousands of seafaring men out of work. For ej ample, V the i conversion of the Maurer win into an' oil-burner would throw out 282 stokers; while the reduced cutl <oesumption would affect the-employment of coal-miners. To increase the brers of labour, lie contended,,was not the right wayr.to solve tlm unenlploved : problem. /. ' . “ b

MATTER FOR ARBITRATION COURT.

The Minister replied that he could not promise legislation to fix 44, 34, or any other hours. “I think,” he added, “that it is a matter for the Arbitration Court.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS19240702.2.37

Bibliographic details

Thames Star, Volume LVII, Issue 16139, 2 July 1924, Page 5

Word Count
458

THE 44-HOUR WEEK. Thames Star, Volume LVII, Issue 16139, 2 July 1924, Page 5

THE 44-HOUR WEEK. Thames Star, Volume LVII, Issue 16139, 2 July 1924, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert