Seddon v Taylor.
. - . —▼ i THE SLANDER CIAJSIE. | SOMEi EIXTRAiVAiGANTJ ABBEIITIOKIS. (Per United Press Association.) i i OHiRIISTCRUECH, Dec. 15- .1 Sergt- Gannon, Troop-Sergt- ait the ': Blesfook Spruit affair, gave evidence ' ■ in plaintiff's favour 1. Mr Taylor asked , himi about a gathering: of witnesses nt thia Clarendon Hotel on the pre- ]. vloius day and' whether some arrange- \ nient was arrived at that, the honor of the xegjiment should be maintained at all dosts- . _ ! Dr- Findlay resented this a.nd said . "Taylor's facts were all false-" ! Mr Taylor appealed to the Judge j and was toldl his remarks were an aspersion ofa the counsel who was present ait the meeting 1A; number of other comtingenters who hadl been -present at the affair "■aye evidencie and were subjected to iii leugtky examination without- disturbing] (their testimony. Some of thenii gave as their "pinion the position token up wvs not one of absolute safety, but they were firm, there was 110 running away-
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS19041215.2.20
Bibliographic details
Thames Star, Volume XXXXI, Issue 10491, 15 December 1904, Page 2
Word Count
158Seddon v Taylor. Thames Star, Volume XXXXI, Issue 10491, 15 December 1904, Page 2
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Thames Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in