Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CIVIL SIDE.

THOIiNALLY' V. VICKEET.

This was a claim of £17 5s lOd, promissory note, and was adjourned by consent to the 25th inst. .

JUDGMENT FOX PLAIKTIFPS

In the tho following cases, judgment was given for the plaintiffs with costs :— R. M. Mitchell v. James Harkins—;A claim of 4s 6d, for rates ; same, y. James Agnew—Claim, 7s for rates (1873); same v. James Agnew—Claim, 7s for rates (1874-75); Marks and McLeay — Claim, £21s for goods. ■. '„

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18750611.2.12.2

Bibliographic details

Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2008, 11 June 1875, Page 2

Word Count
75

CIVIL SIDE. Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2008, 11 June 1875, Page 2

CIVIL SIDE. Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2008, 11 June 1875, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert