"""J" rflpil-—ThV attendance of Power mj delirium was not sufficient. Thero is noj evidence that' this was tho case an; the night of the bursting of the the bandages were frequently takert off, and,fctifetUhe/resuli 'jmust have! been injurious. Your Committee alsoj think that it it proved that there was a; They believe that from the position ot jtbcj •W ftK*MUh«.firepja g e AiyrM- .oofe possible, and that the statement that the .rp»tieH^h»d t «»otiwWV:to .movo^ho. arm ■boutrafersio/Atfttttttquent stage, Jntf testimony ,©£MM«dtfUj|»w,<)athi»i,iJoio<i is very strong, and your committee beliejfib* have' £*n verjj injurious:' B'isWicult to suppose thatf ftbM.thonild hare jtaken Plac^so frequently! and to such aiTextent when this visitor was present* and|npt.at alltwhen she wast ahaent. *Bui apart from this, it is certain inaflßuo pulling off .of,the, bandages was 1, fully known'; and that this should have; "been"pcf mt«e"d-liight'after'"night/ «fid levera! timdsi Am tho: same,? night,;. is', a *Se¥ wlft'your cKmnimerih'inlc'is worthy of great bhime. If tho warders ' weteojotjable to/, do;; th^ additional" help could easily nave been obtained. Itdqesr noj; appear that thedoctor was aware of this, nor is it certain! Mr. Aitkcn wai:" but both warders werej MfeSjtoAt&h!* ."« <•-•>*> '- 4; ". ' Sixth.—The examination twice or thrice a week your committee considered, was: , The medical testimony'on ; tnis point is conclusive. Especially was; it not sufecicnt?*ffer'diffused'inaammationj had set in. ' - --• . „ „ _, i ivs Serenih.rrThe; practice followed by^ vr.\ Lethfcriflge oL permitting :ths wound toj be dressed and completely bandaged up, before he attended, unless special orders; "to the contrary wVrtf 'given,' you* Commit-; tee consider highly objectionable; a* it> is'itiakhig not himself; but tha nurseithe; judge of the state cf-tho wound; and in, this canefitrwiwall th« more objectionable, as the dispenser" and the warders declare' that, frpm-j the difficulty, of, raising the arm, they never saw the wound at all.. : j -. Eighth. Although^the opinion of the medical men is conflicting in regard to the \ i exposure "of the Wbund for some time 1, the j committee^ 'especially on- account' of; ithe; testimony of Power himself, are afraid it'w* 13;:injuricug.V; lXt:;««ny rat?.,^ ??? m\ toinly disapprove.Of the nurse! Tteepuig: "th^waund'fffn'dress^'solqng; arid 16f-the | doctor not attending'tilll'2 o'clock/ when j ifthftd giTflU,orders on the previous day } to have^tlirtuhdresiedfor.hisinspection,.; Ninth.T-Jiypm the serious nature of the« wound},* consultation ought to have beenj beld sooner.- The case became serious 1 after diffusedinflanfmatibn set in; and be- j ' fore the artery burst- the arm was in a '-yery'bwf state.:"Yet,-up to'lthat tinii; two additional'medical men had seen the j case only once, and there was no con-: "suftatidn 'till after the*bursting the! 'arferyV^s thfere 'are Honorary Sur-; geons appointed'for' the purpose; thei?e< ought T tp .have be,en a consultatic n much j Tour'ddnimitiee.canmot conclude with- \ -ont-stating^-that in giving his - evidence ; manifeste4 a-spirit which, elicited their I highfst-H^?1111?11 f X°>' * Testimony against others Bad to be drawn • from hinvOlhd if/he; could, at all give an; * answer favourable»,ta,others ho did it.' Throughout {'. bis. examination ;he was tho^iiglily frominltjill-foeh'ng or. malice against anyone;? 'and.your* Ca- , . mittee desire to express their sympathy: with him in r the,<jal»HiitQus circumstances ! in which the'loss of his' right arm has ; placed him. James Hili, Chairman. , Mr. WgnalPsaid'that^iii tKcifaAbject i was one of very great importance, it was j desirable ihat the CommitJwe^hould have; some time allowed them for it's considera-} tion, and would therefore [move, i that, j at the conclusion of the ordinary business, ; the meeting aojcWned for that purpose. .; A controversy then arose as to whether; th'erepdrfsliouia be printed for the con"- j sf??nience:pf thejGommittee, qc what/form; it should tiikel " Fatb'eV lionergkh wished; to have it printedrin'pamphlet form, and; would contribute half of whatever thei cost migb.te*e>': Mr.-Wilkjnion of the; Advertiser offered to print the report in | Ihe oidinary news imtworissues^ (the first part of ttie report inlhe second'day) or to -.print, t thej_whole-of it t , in one issuft-for.a! ppijnc(;,^ The "matter was; ; ultimateVleft in 4 'tkehandsof^he;CommitteeVXh ( e;!Eev. J.; We., ,Maca*one^l, and; M**> Bi»*^«re *P.Poiatea House Comimittep foi the ensuing month. t -.-., v •:•'.' = < .;-•■■'r<-J \
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18740903.2.13
Bibliographic details
Thames Star, Volume VI, Issue 1769, 3 September 1874, Page 3
Word Count
654Untitled Thames Star, Volume VI, Issue 1769, 3 September 1874, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.