Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

THIS DAT.

(Before W.Fbaseb, Ear}., R.M.) BKEACIT OF THE MUNICIPAL POLICE ACT. Thomas Gnrvey was charged with being the driYor of a tehicle, and did remain at guch a distance as not to have full control of the horse. Defendant pleaded guilty. His" 'Worship" lot the defendant off on a promise to again become a good templar. BBEACH OF THB POBLIC itEALTH AC f. Jamei Darrow was charged by the Vaccination Officer wilh neglect in not having his child Mary Darrow vaccinated. Defendant said his child had been Vaccinated in March last, but thought ifc had not been registered. E. H. Power said the action had been brought under the 12fch section of the Public Health Act. Mr. Darrow's', defence wat that the child.had been vaccinated, but not by a medical practitioner; he should like to hare the opinion of the Bench as to what a medical practitioner really is. Defendant sworn said—l have a child named E..M. Darrow ; it has been vaccinated. To Mr. Power: The child was vaccinated by some neighbors. My wife had been twice to your office, in office-hours, and you were out. Mr. Power then read sereral extracts from the Public Health Act, also a letter from the Colonial Government requesting a medical certificate in every case in which vaccination had been successfully performed. Mr. Power stated that in many cases vaccination had been performed by old women and. not by a duly qualified medical practitioner. His Worship remarked that vaccination may be performed by an old woman, but the Act distinctly states that a certificate must be obtained arid signed by a duly qualified medical man, that the> vaccination had come to a successful issue. No doubt Mr. Power had brought this case before the Gourt to give publicity to the provisions of the Act. . Mr. Power informed His Worship that was the case. Fined Is, and costs 10s 6d. SIMIIAR CHABGE. John Goldsworthy was charged under the Public Health Act with a similar offence. . ■ ■- ■ : : •/' ■'. „• '• ' ": V . .'■ \ Fined Is, and Costs 10s 6d. The Court Adjourned. ;

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18740725.2.18

Bibliographic details

Thames Star, Volume IIII, Issue 1735, 25 July 1874, Page 3

Word Count
344

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume IIII, Issue 1735, 25 July 1874, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume IIII, Issue 1735, 25 July 1874, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert