RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Thames Star, Volume IIII, Issue 1698, 12 June 1874, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

THIS DAY. (Before W. Fuaseb, Esq., E.JI.J CIVIL SIDE. ' , r Judgments fok Plaintiffs. Mackio v. John McColl-A claim of LSWs for Roods and costs ; E. T. Herbert v. James Rice Mo,^ an -£2 5s goods, and Defended Cases. J. W. TILLER V. PETER WHELAN. 11 i?V a ? laim for £5 163' moner alleged to be owing for board and lodging After hearing two or three witnesses judgment was given for plaintiff for £1 ss, and 9s costs. " GOUBD V BAWDEN. ; I lug was a claim for wages; £2 8s 4d Id this case, which appeared io be a question of a mdtter..of usage aroomrft carters, judgment went for plaintiff for ■5 S k ai!-, was in referenco-to the £2 until next Court day. ' n • BFio ? M"c- V- ki»ton. ' Claim of £8 7* for calls. ■r Mp. Macdonaid for, plaintiffs; Mr. Tyler for defendant. Plaintiffs Mcroncnsuited with costs, His Worship ruling that the Act had not been complied with strictly. . W l HIRK T. W. DAVIS*. anJfii 91!? aros.^ o) lt thesale-of a cow, and from the evidence that was. produced it appeared that defendant bx>u4t a cow ft-om plaintiff through one Maber a\eC tiff of plaintiff; that defendant paid £1 lZ nVImKJ ,aUthe moße-' r he h^upon mm; that Maher accompanied or rathentehvered the cow at thepremises of defenin F pto thls Point, the evidence-on bo h sidea agreed. • Plaintiff claims jhe l/ii I 9 u the ? urc> ase money, and de. fendant alleges. that' it was paid to Maher on delivery of |he cow. ,: His Worship remarked that perjury had been committed on one side or the other, and reserved judgment. Mr Macdonaid, for defendant; remarked that if the judgment were adverse to his client he woald appeal, to which refreshbg reP an appeal ffOuld>e The Court adjourned. , r