Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WIDOW REMARRIES

BENEFIT LOST UNDER WILL By Telegraph—Press Association HAMILTON, December 5. In a case under the Family Protection Act heard in the Supreme Court to-day. Mr Justice Reed held that the court had no jurisdiction to vary a condition made by the testator that the benefits accruing to his widow under his will should terminate on her remarriage. His moral duty was performed when he provided for his widow during her widowhood. When she altered her status she ceased to have any moral claim to override the lawful restriction imposed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19351206.2.56

Bibliographic details

Timaru Herald, Volume CXL, Issue 20284, 6 December 1935, Page 10

Word Count
91

WIDOW REMARRIES Timaru Herald, Volume CXL, Issue 20284, 6 December 1935, Page 10

WIDOW REMARRIES Timaru Herald, Volume CXL, Issue 20284, 6 December 1935, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert