Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“A SILLY CANARD.”

ALLEGED SPLIT IN LABOUR PA RTY. AN EMPHATIC DENIAL. By Telegraph—Presa Asaocia tloa. WELLINGTON, February 26. The rumours circulated in a Christchurch newspaper, of a split in the Labour Party M-ere emphatically denied by high officials of tho movement in Wellington to-day. “There is not a tittle of truth in the statements; they are utter rubbish, just a silly canard, and someone’s imagination has been working overtime,” was the summing up of the secretary of the Parliamentary Labour Party (Mr P. Fraser). The allegation, as published, was that moderate members of the party, chafing under its leadership, were stated to be withdrawing from the Labour Party’s ranks, tho names connected with the supposed scheme being Messrs W. L. Martin (Raglan), W. J. Jordan (Manukau), F. Langstone (Waimarino), J. M. Munro (Dunedin North), and E. J. Howard (Christchurch South.) Mr Fraser, after making the declaration quoted above, went on to say that there M-ere no more leval members to the Party than those named and they had proved their loyalty by many years of service to Labour.

Mr H. E. Holland’s re-election to the' leadership of the Party, p or the life of the present Parliament, which took place during the recent brief session, had not only been unanimously, but enthusiastic, those present indulging in enlarging on his work for tho movement and the Party.

In endorsing tho statments made by Mr Fraser, tne secertary of the New Zealand Labour Party (Mr W. Nash), said that headquarters in Wellington Mould be the first to learn of any such dissension, and he had never hoard the slightest suggestion of it. Ho could not possibly dream of anything of the kind happening, as the members mentioned Mere in constant toucli with the national office, as late as yesterday. “What better evidence of repudiation can be given,” Mr' Nash added, “than the letter I have just received from Mr Jordan, intimating that he would be attending the National Conference.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19290227.2.10

Bibliographic details

Timaru Herald, Volume CXXV, Issue 18201, 27 February 1929, Page 2

Word Count
328

“A SILLY CANARD.” Timaru Herald, Volume CXXV, Issue 18201, 27 February 1929, Page 2

“A SILLY CANARD.” Timaru Herald, Volume CXXV, Issue 18201, 27 February 1929, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert