Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"CROOK " OR "CRONK."

CONSTABLE AS ETYMOLOGIST. « - (Melbourne''Argus." / An unpleasaut_disagreement between -two brotuers, formed the subject of ah action for slander ihr the County Courton August 26, "before Judge Box. The brothers Lad formerly been partners, - and the slander action arose by way of counter-claim on a partnership ac.tibnj disposed of some days ago. , The 'claim*'was for £4JD. i' William Henry Bailey, examined by Mr Purves, said: On .May 31 last I went into the United Kingdom Hotel, Clifton Hill, with two friends. My brother came in and said he wanted to speak, me. -I said 1 did not want to speak to him, but afterwards, outside the hotel, he said, in the presence : of two other persons, "You are dealing, in cronk' bicycles and stolen stuff/' 1 said, "It's a He. Who told you?" and he said that a friend had-told him, but he would not give the friend's name. He added, '■'• I know it "is true," and I said he was a nice' brother to make an accusation like that. Judge Box: J, don't know that I know the meaning of '* cronk." Mr Cohen: And you cannot ask a witness what lie understood by them. •You could-ask the meaning- of foreign words used in the presence of foreign? era-Jbut not'of'such, words as, this. ,- : 'Judge Box: -I don't want to be told the meaning of ~ ordinary English words but this is. slang. Am I sup-, posed to know the meaning of every term in the thieves' vocabulary. However,- I know what " cronk " means: Mr Cohen: And that won't help your. Honour much, for I see the term in the statement of claim is "crook," not " cronk." Judge Box: Mr Purvis, in his opening, used " cronk." Perhaps they mean the same thing. - Mr? Tucker: They do, your Honour. - William Tom:> Ellison, in answer to Mr Tucker, said: I am a constable of police, stationed at Clifton Hill. Mr Tucker: I propose to ask this witness the meaning of " crook." and •'cronk." ■-. Mr Cohen: This man may be a very 'good constable, but he is not a master of' English or adictionary. My friend might, ask a person who" heard the words what he understood by them, but that is the furthest he could go. To ask a constable, however fine a mnn he may he . physically,' the meaning of a word is ridiculous. Judge Box: Well, perhaps you would like'a, professor. However. I don't think I can ask tins constable to give 'me the meaning of cronk or crook. Do yon press your objection, Mr Cohen. Mr Cohen: I do. Judgo Box: I'll note your objection. I don't know how the judicial mind is going to be affected, but I will admit the question.

Mr Tucker (to the witness): Do you know the words "crook" and "cronk?" —I do. Is there any difference between the words? —In my opinion it depends on the sentence they are given in. »Judge Box: You are dealing' in " crook " or " cronk " bicycles." What "do you' understand by that? —I. would, understand they Were stolen bicycles. By your definition I understand that you are looking at it from a police point of view:-'—Yes, certainly. The same words ; might in another sentence mean sick. If a person said, "1 feel ' cronk ' or ' crook ' " that would mean sick. --■-' <: -: It all!depends on the context, then. It may mean sick or ill? —Yes, hut not in this case, 1 think. , Mr Cohen, in opening the defendant s case, said the brothers had been lurmerlv partners. They parted withont any uutl. blood, hut the defendant heard -that his brotiicr was 'dealing in crook stuif. HeUhought 'it his duty,-.as onebrother to another, and as one careful of the family honour, to tell Ins brother. He took extreme precautious tosce that-no one heard tlie conversation. Defendant said, " 1 don c know whether there is any trutn in the report You.-do. 1 .hope to: Ood; there JTnot. Now, 1 have done my duty as a brother" The d'efendant having given evidence to tuis effect. . ■•'•, ' " Jud«'e Box found that the words were used, and they were used just after the summons In'the other casoiwas served 1 They were defamatory, and therewould, therefore, be a verdict tor tthe 1 plaintilf, William Henry Bailey, -for £lO, with costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19090906.2.44

Bibliographic details

Timaru Herald, Volume XIIC, Issue 13998, 6 September 1909, Page 7

Word Count
711

"CROOK" OR "CRONK." Timaru Herald, Volume XIIC, Issue 13998, 6 September 1909, Page 7

"CROOK" OR "CRONK." Timaru Herald, Volume XIIC, Issue 13998, 6 September 1909, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert