Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THEY MUST AGREE.

As to matterß that have no pracli'cal outcome it is of no cousequeiKL [whether we agree or not. The earti. may be, as some say it is, a moltei. mass (save for a shell a few mik thick on the outside), or it may lx solid and cool all the way through from London to Sydney. However ii may be we can do nothing about it. So lejt.the scientific chaps go on speculating to their heart's content; the;-world will keep revolving as usual, and we shall have to continue picking lip our living from its surface. ■Recently in my reading I have come upon articles in certain medical jourhalß—uncanny}uninterestiug pub lications, that they are, for non-profes-sional perusal—going to show that it is not the heart which impels the blood through the. body, but the chemical action of oxygen inhaled by the lungß. " ' ' ''""

• Yet what odds would it make? None whatever. Fair womon would- blush by the help of the capillaries as of old, and we should tie rags around cut fingers just the same. It follows, my brethren, that some things may be mysteries to the'end of the chapter, and no harm .done, and others may differ without disturbing the serenity of our passing days—a most soothing reflection.

But the advantage or otherwise of a person's food agreeing or. disagreeing.with, him is not a mere matter of opinion. There is only one way to look at that. As a whole food musf agree withjis, and we with it, or we are ruined. A lady of Sheffield, Mrs. S. A. Smith, suffered a long, wearisome and' costly illness; simply because her food; failed, to. agree with her. For three years she was weak and wretched on account of it.. The light and pleasure went out of her life, - She needed to eat, of course, just J as she needed to breathe; yet, after every meal—commonly of . light thinp taken in small quantities, and Blowly—she was immediately seized with pains in the stomach, the chest and'the left "side. Was not this a hard recompense for doing what nature compelled her to do—to eat? •: Any act which causes pain is performed as seldom as possible, and as incompletely.' For who wants to suffer?

Eating so little—nop naif as much as her body called for—Mrs. Smith lost flesh''audistrength. Necessarily. Draw more money out of the bank than you deposit and presently the bank returns your oheques marked "no funds." To be sure. Nobody can make twice two equal five.

"I got to be so feeble I could scarcely get about,' says the lady. "1 was like this for three years from the spring of 1893—being worse in the spring than at other seasons. What to do more than I had done I didn't know, when one day my aunt, Mrs. William Andrew, of Willoughton, urged me to take Mother* Seigel's Syrup.- ' After having done so for a short time the complaint—indigestionwas better, and soon it wholly disappeared. Lam'now entirely cured and strong and hearty as I was before my illness came upon me. You may rest assured that, after so fortunate an experience with Mother Seigel's Syrup, I recommended it to all my friends, and in sending you this short statement it is my wish that you should print it for the good of others if you so desire."—(Signed) Si A. Smith, 44 Ditchingham road, Sheffield, June 3, 1898.

"In April of this year (1898); says another, "my health began to fail ; 1 felt drowsy and tired with the least exertion. After every meal I had oppression at the ohest and sides, and a great deal of pain. Whatever food I took disagreed with me, and I grew weak. ' I am a dressmaker, and when at my work T had so great pain 1 cpuld hardly bear it. I tried all the usual medicines for indigestion, but got worse and worse. One day in July I' read about 1 Mother :• • Syrup, and got a bottle of Hattersley, chemist, West India Dock-raid, aild in a few days felt better. After taking a second bottle I. was cured, and have been well ever since."—(Signed) Miss Minnie Wyatt, 46' West India Dock road, London, E., October, 14,

1898. , "■" : Tes, it is true, health and life depend on a perfect agreement between ourselves and ■,our food. This is not a matter of opinion. It is a vital and living relationship, and nothing does so much to promote the agreement as the frequent and timely use of Mother Seigel's Syrup. ;

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THA18991128.2.2

Bibliographic details

Thames Advertiser, Volume XXIX, Issue 9497, 28 November 1899, Page 1

Word Count
754

THEY MUST AGREE. Thames Advertiser, Volume XXIX, Issue 9497, 28 November 1899, Page 1

THEY MUST AGREE. Thames Advertiser, Volume XXIX, Issue 9497, 28 November 1899, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert