Breach of Promise Case.
Press Association.) Auckland, March 23. The case, Caroline Parry v. George Crotheis, a claim for £200 damages for • breach of promise of marriage again occupied the attention of the Supreme Court to-day. The defendant did not put in an appearance, and after hearing the case for plaintill His Honor in summing up said that no doubt the verdict must be for plaintiiF whoso evidence was clear and ulraightforward. He hoped with regard to the borrowed money that it would be dealt with in another place. The plaintiff was fortunate in not marrying such a scoundrel as defendant. The jury retired, and after a feiy'ininutes' deliberation brought in a viiidiot for the tull amount claimed, His Honor entered up judgment accordingly with costs on the lowest settle,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THA18970324.2.12
Bibliographic details
Thames Advertiser, Volume XXIX, Issue 8693, 24 March 1897, Page 2
Word Count
130Breach of Promise Case. Thames Advertiser, Volume XXIX, Issue 8693, 24 March 1897, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.