Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A LIBEL CASE.

NO GROUND FOR SUIT. Per Press Association. WELLINGTON, Dec. 8. In the libs! case Leigh Hunt v. H. B. Maunsell, a claim for £ISOO, counsel for the defence asked for a nonsuit on the ground that there was no evidence of malice. His Honour said that the allegedly defamatory statement made on an occasion admittedly' privileged. In that case tho onus lay upon plaintiff to prove that the privilege was abused, and that there was expressed malice. Tho question was whether or not there was evidence to justify the jury, were the matter left in iti hancls, to find malice. “There must be substantial evidence,” he added, “and I must confess I cannot see any such evidence.” , ■ His Honour accordingly dismissed the jury, and entered a non-suit with costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH19201209.2.68

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Herald, Volume LXVIII, Issue 16913, 9 December 1920, Page 6

Word Count
132

A LIBEL CASE. Taranaki Herald, Volume LXVIII, Issue 16913, 9 December 1920, Page 6

A LIBEL CASE. Taranaki Herald, Volume LXVIII, Issue 16913, 9 December 1920, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert