Inglewood News.
(jTrom Our Own Correspondent.)
S3I. COURT,
(Before Mr A. Tnrnbull, SJJT.) Judgment wont by cMault in tho foil owing- cases ■ — > Vickers - & . Stevens v. JW. Baker, claliu Is and solicitor's Joe 10s (id. Mr Thomson for plaintiff. C. 0., Smith y. f A. Onions, claini £'i Ss 6d and 15s costs, , Mr Thomson tor plaintiir. fl. Julian v. C. PFansem, olaim^O 2s Sd, with costs 20s. Mr Thomson for plaintiff. W. L. ,Spacl>jm.an v. iW. J. ? }H>aps,, claim £1 0s . Cd^witV Ks cost's^. „Mr Crombie for plaintiff. •" Same v. A. Onions, clafrn £1 3s, and costs £S. Mr Crombiefor plaintiff. In the case of "G. Tapp v. A. GSielsen, R. Jlarvey, and W. 'Thi'ntj a defended, case adjourned from last oourt day', judgm/nt was given against W. .Hunt for amount claitmcd.-and 12s costs. Mr Crombie for plaintiff and Mr Thomson for one of the defendants ■Neilsen). •W. L. Martin v. J. Tarry, claim, of £10 10a. This was a . case where plaintiff sought to recover wages owing by sub-contractor from, the contractor. After hearing evidence judgment wont for plaintiff for £5 ss, being almount paid into Court. Mr Crambie for plaintiff and Mr Tho.msbn for defendant.'' JUDGMENT, SUMMONSES. R. Sponce v. .W. L. ?iTartin. Claim £1 Us. No appearance of- defen-' d'ant. Ordered to pay am'opint foitffch* with, in default ono^eek. . Vi'okers anid Stevens (ju(dg ( m,6rit creditors) v. John H. Magee (Jj/u|djgment debtor) anil .Moa Roaid Boarfd) (s]ulbdelffcors).' Claim £7 15s 6d. Wo afopeaKanjco of s.nfe,-Uebtojrs. Order miaide absolute with. 15a 0& costistfj -Mr Thomson for ju^gmeni creditors'. ' cßiaccisrAL. \ - R., Rowan (Nbxio'us !Weetis Intepeetorj v. J. G. 8.- Forrester, jtjreacih of Noisionrs WeeHs Act, by failing, to clear • nagtw,ort. , Defenßant / ptteaifed guilty, an(d was fined 50s ; an|d coats 10s. Same tfefenfcfcant wais! further' cliargjejcJ with' failing to olear Wiadkbewpiesi. B?e pleaded guilty, an® was fined 50s anld Costs 7s. Same v. Geo. and F. Jellymian, for failing to clear ox-eye daisy, a mokiaus weal. Defendants pleaded guilty awd were fined 50s anfd costs 10s. Police v.. Geo^ Mattodk. Defenjclant was charjge'd that he did on ihe 21st day of February, 1905, near ijigJewicxod, take two imported tfaut by meemp of an ilnlawful co!ntriv l anee > ,to wit, a spear*. l ße , pileajdMd not guilty ami was dismissed with' a Catrtiottt.
Same -v. Fred. 'Mattooto. The defendant 1 wa# cjhargect with iMo same bfltenlcte i tvs i pgrevtioWs! f def enßaaxk, he pleaidett guilty, and was fin«d £2, anfcl costs 395. Mv Thomson apjpearcfcl for the Taranald Acclimatisation Society, anid jMr Spentoe, for :defensatots in above Cases.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH19050320.2.36
Bibliographic details
Taranaki Herald, Volume LIV, Issue 12811, 20 March 1905, Page 5
Word Count
427Inglewood News. Taranaki Herald, Volume LIV, Issue 12811, 20 March 1905, Page 5
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.