Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DEFAULTING HARBOUR BOARDS.

j Speaking in reference to tho default of j the New Plymouth and Oiruaru Harbour r Boards, the Premier said to a' deputation j that waited on him in Auckland, that the I Government could not deal with that I matter, as it would mean admitting a , liability. •' The case of the New Plymouth ' T Board is different from that of Oamaru. The New Plymouth Board became default J because it could not help it. It had no , funds, and therefore could not continue to ' pay the interest; but the Oamaru Board, ' on the other hand, has £2700 Q-year of ; rating power which has not boen taxed J yet. It appears to me that tho . Oamaru people are bound to col"sleet" s leet those rites, and if they were , collected there would bo no default* ; They argue that the £100,000 for which they have become default is only a portion \ of their loan. They havo not defuultod upon the first loan of £100,000, the second 1 loan of £50,000, or the loan from tho Government of £30,000; they defaulted on • another loan of £100,000, and they claim that the extra rating power affects only the loans on which they are paying interest, . and cannot be used for the loan of j £100,000, on which they had defaulted. It is a peculiar position altogether. I a«u , not sure but that they could bo made to " Could not the Government appoint a [ receiver ?" I " The Government have no pq\ror to appoint a receiver, because the Board' is paying interest on tho Government loan. | It ia a very peculiar case of default, dif- ( ferent from any other case I have seen. ( There have been three orfou<- defaulting . local bodies, and in each case tho receiver J having been put in has gone out again, bo that the local body concerned arranged , matters, paying 20s in the £. The re- ' ceivorin every case has, been a cure for I default. But the receiver would not be a euro at New Plymouth, because there they ' havo exhausted their rating power. With ', the extension of settlement, however, New Plymouth must pay its way ultimately. The question does arise whether it. would not be a wise step on the part of the f Government to capitalise the loans on | deferred payment land ond perpetual leaao. ' This would remove the default for a time, > and the colony could not lose by it. That matter is now under the consideration of > tho Government." i | | [ , { . i [ '

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH18911215.2.16

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Herald, Volume XL, Issue 9265, 15 December 1891, Page 2

Word Count
418

DEFAULTING HARBOUR BOARDS. Taranaki Herald, Volume XL, Issue 9265, 15 December 1891, Page 2

DEFAULTING HARBOUR BOARDS. Taranaki Herald, Volume XL, Issue 9265, 15 December 1891, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert