Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RAILWAY PASSENGERS’ LUGGAGE

CJIRISTCiUJRCH, .Inly 30; The lion, d. I). Ormond sued the 'Railway Department for £23 9/, the value of u bag and its contents lost oil (lie railway. The plaintiff arrived from Wellington at Lyttelton by steamer, and placed two Gladstone bugs in the van of a train waiting on:tho wharf, giving them in charge of a matt wearing a railway uniform. lie travelled to Christchurch by the same train. One bag has not been seen siuoo Mr jiishop, S.M., gave judgment against Mr Ormond, on the ground that provision was made under the Railways Act that the Government was not responsible for passengers’ luggage unless checked. Plaintiff J)ad not checked his luggage, and could not recover.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML19060731.2.24

Bibliographic details

Temuka Leader, Issue 5421, 31 July 1906, Page 3

Word Count
119

RAILWAY PASSENGERS’ LUGGAGE Temuka Leader, Issue 5421, 31 July 1906, Page 3

RAILWAY PASSENGERS’ LUGGAGE Temuka Leader, Issue 5421, 31 July 1906, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert