Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT.

Geraldine—Tuesday, Sept. 8, 1891. [Before C. A. Wray, Esq., R.M., and H. W. Moore, Esq,, J.P.] JUVENILE LAREJKINISM. The adjourned case against four boys for writing indecent words on the public school and breaking trees was dismissed, the lads with one exception having been punished by their parents. The lad who had not been punished was not at home, but, when he returns, his father, who appeared in court, promised to punish him. WIFUL DAMAGE. 0. G. Bradley sued John Patrick, a young man, for the value of damage done to a buggy alleged by him to have been wilfully damaged by defendant and a number of other young men. O. G. Bradley, storekeeper, of Hilton, deposed that several young men had during his absence, and without his permission, taken a buggy off his promises. It was ‘about eight or nine o’clock at night and they had it for about half an hour, when he got word that it had gone over the terrace. He went out to see and found the shafts broken, the wheels injured, and the axle bent. Defendant, when asked, acknowledged to him that he was one of the young men who did the damage and offered to pay for the shafts. Witness would not take payment for the shafts, but wanted payment for the whole of the damage. He sued Patrick, because if he got a conviction the others would help Patrick to pay. John Patrick, defendant, swore that he never touched the buggy, and never offered to pay for the shafts. He never had any conversation with plaintiff about the buggy. James Bryan Cornelius Rryan, and Alexander Beattie corroborated the statements made by defendant.

The Bench said, according to the evidence, the plaintiff had got hold of the wrong man. The case would be dismissed. Plaintiff to pay costs and witnesses’ expenses. The Court then rose.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18910910.2.10

Bibliographic details

Temuka Leader, Issue 2252, 10 September 1891, Page 2

Word Count
315

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT. Temuka Leader, Issue 2252, 10 September 1891, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATES COURT. Temuka Leader, Issue 2252, 10 September 1891, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert