Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHARGE DISMISSED

TREATMENT OF CALF HAWERA COURT CASE "This is a criminal charge and heavy penalties are provided for," said Mr. J. H. Salmon, S.M., in the Hawera Magistrate's Court whe» dismissing a charge brought against William Francis McCullough, a Stratford cattle dealer, by Mr. John Joseph Cahill, honorary inspector for the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. It was alleged that on October 26 at Hawera McCullough failed to supply a calf with proper and suflicient food. Mr. L. A. Taylor represented the society. In evidence Cahill stated that from the appearance of the calf and distended state of its mother's udder when he saw them at the Hawera sale, the calf had not been fed later than 5 p.m. on the prevlous day. The calf was wearing a nose-bag, or muzzle, and Cahill considered it had been wearing it for some hours. For the defence McCullough, who was represented by Mr. R. Tyrer, stated that on the morning of October 26 he trucked the cow and calf from Stratford to Hawera. Just prior to the trucking, at about 5.45 o'clock, he placed a nose-bag on the calf. At the Hawera sale he received no bid for the cow because she was sucked out. When interrogated at Hawera by the inspector he was not then aware that he was actually an inspector, said McCullough. Otherwise he would have given him a full explanation of when the nose-bag was placed on the calf. In dismissing the case Mr. Salmon said that the charge was brought mainly on the inspector's assumption that the calf had not been fed since 5 p.m. on the previous day. McCullough's evidence, by which he was impressed, had disproved this, however. It was not possible, therefore, to make a conviction. Nevertheless, in cases where the conditions were such as the inspector had assumed, a penalty would be imposed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19391202.2.100.1

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 2 December 1939, Page 10

Word Count
314

CHARGE DISMISSED Taranaki Daily News, 2 December 1939, Page 10

CHARGE DISMISSED Taranaki Daily News, 2 December 1939, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert